The U.S. Department of Labor's Independent Contractor Rule Postponed as the New Administration Reconsiders
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.09.21
On Tuesday, March 2, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) postponed the effective date for a new regulation establishing a five-factor test for determining independent contractor classification. The rule, promulgated by the Trump Administration and previously scheduled to go into effect on March 8, and titled “Independent Contractor Status under the Fair Labor Standards Act” (Rule), is now slated to go into effect on May 7. The DOL announced that it will take this additional time to consider the legal, policy, and enforcement implications of the Rule, potentially calling into question whether the Rule will take effect at all, or if it does, how it might be modified.
The test used in determining whether workers are independent contractors or employees has significant ramifications for the applicability of wage and hour laws such as the Fair Labor Standards Act enforced by the DOL. At a high level, the test is designed to evaluate the economic realities of the working relationship to determine whether workers are economically dependent on a business, and so are more like employees, or are in business for themselves, and so are more like independent contractors. Most importantly, the test examines the control that workers have over their own work and the opportunity for profit or loss as a result of personal investment. The amount of skill required for the position, the permanence of the working relationship, and how integrated a worker’s role is to the organization’s overall operation are also factors that can assist with the analysis.
Between now and May 7, businesses should continue to assess the impact the Rule, as phrased, would have on the classification of their workers. This assessment involves not only the agreements in place with those engaged on an independent contractor basis, but also the realities on the ground. Given the signaling from the Biden administration, however, businesses would do well to be equally prepared for the Rule’s demise.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
