The Environment Act 2021, Highly Anticipated Legislation Crucial to UK Supply Chain Operations
Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.19.22
In November 2021 the UK Government’s Environment Bill, an eagerly awaited piece of legislation, finally became law. This highly anticipated piece of legislation will impact both the food and retail sector through numerous measures as outlined below.
Now known as the Environment Act 2021, at its core, the Act intends to accelerate and enhance our environmental protection focusing on setting clear targets, plans and policies for improving the natural environment. There are four key priority areas: air quality, biodiversity, water and waste with a strong commitment to reverse the decline in species by 2030 through improving habitats for nature and tackling deforestation.
As 80% of the world’s deforestation is linked to agricultural production, the Act has sought to combat further habitat destruction through targeted measures on UK businesses and supply chains. Illegal deforestation is linked to a number of commodities in the UK including; soya, palm oil, timber, pulp and paper, beef and leather, rubber and cocoa. It is now illegal for UK businesses to use key commodities if they have not been produced in line with local laws where protection of natural ecosystems is at the forefront.
Resultingly greater systems of due diligence will be required, businesses should identify and obtain information on commodities used, undertaking a risk review that relevant local laws were complied with when obtaining those. To substantiate this requirement, an annual reporting obligation on deforestation in a UK business’s supply chain will follow six months from the end of the UK financial year.
The aim of such measures is to build greater resilience, traceability and sustainability in the UK’s supply chain whilst contributing to the end of the climate crisis.
Comment
One commented flaw with the Act is that it currently only restricts forest risk commodities produced ‘illegally’ under that producer’s country laws. Notably the Brazilian Government is in the process of passing a package of laws that will ultimately weaken or abolish forest protections further. Two related Bills have been approved in Brazil’s lower House of Parliament and are awaiting a vote in the Senate.
Although Brazilian Environmental Minister Jaoquim Leite announced at COP26 that the country would update its climate goals to include zero illegal deforestation by 2028 his comments sat in stark contrast to the statistic published thereafter. The Amazon rainforest experienced its highest deforestation rates in 15 years with speculation that almost all was through illegal conduct. This undoubtedly highlights a crucial gap in the Environment Act and the need for international collaboration to eliminate deforestation.
What’s next
Secondary legislation is required to implement the provisions of the Act and on 3 December 2021 the secondary legislation consultation was released by Defra. Therefore, further intricacies on the legislation, including but not limited to, which commodities will be in scope of the regulations, which businesses will be subject to the provisions and how the requirements will be enforced, will be provided in due course with the consultation closing 11 March 2022.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
