1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Taking Care of Business (Systems): DoD Proposes to Change the Definition of a Business System Deficiency

Taking Care of Business (Systems): DoD Proposes to Change the Definition of a Business System Deficiency

Client Alert | 1 min read | 06.28.24

The Department of Defense (DoD) recently announced that it seeks public comments on a proposed change to the contractor business systems regime.  The proposed rule would amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) by replacing the phrase “significant deficiency” with the new defined term “material weakness,” to mean “a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in the internal control over information in contractor business systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.”  In addition, the term would provide that a “reasonable possibility exists when the likelihood of an event occurring is— (1) Probable; or (2) More than remote but less than likely.” 

Comments are due no later than August 26, 2024.  The full text of the notice is available here. 

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 requires that the DFARS business systems clauses implement criteria for contractors’ accounting, cost estimating, material management & accounting, earned value management, purchasing, and property management systems.  The clauses allow the government to temporarily withhold payment on a covered contract if a significant deficiency in a business system is identified.  Currently, the DFARS contractor business systems clauses define “significant deficiency” as “a shortcoming in the system that materially affects the ability of officials of the [DoD] to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed for management purposes.”  

Over the past few years, DoD has increased its focus on reviews of contractor business systems, leading to an uptick in findings of significant deficiencies.  Indeed, DCAA’s FY 2023 Report to Congress identified business systems reviews as one of DCAA’s top three priorities.  The proposed rule change, required by the FY 2021 NDAA, purports to create consistency with generally accepted auditing standards and reduce DoD and contractor confusion about the seriousness of deficiencies. 

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights