Take Two: DoD Issues Another Proposed Rule on Performance-Based Payments
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.23.19
On April 30, 2019, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a proposed rule to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to address the use of performance-based payments. The proposed rule, which purports to implement section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017, would:
- Remove the restrictions at DFARS 232.1001(a), 252.232-7012(b)(i), and 252.232-7013(b)(i) that previously limited performance-based payments to amounts not greater than costs incurred up to the time of payment (though contractors would still be required to report costs incurred when requesting performance-based payments).
- Revise DFARS 232.1001 to explain that nontraditional defense contractors and other private sector companies are eligible to receive performance-based payments consistent with best commercial practices.
- Update DFARS 232.1003-70, 252.232-7012, and 252.232-7013 to require contractors be in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to receive performance-based payments (though Government-unique accounting systems or practices would not be a prerequisite).
- Require offerors responding to a solicitation, which may result in a contract providing performance-based payments, to represent that the output of the offeror’s accounting system is in compliance with GAAP, as evidenced by audited financial statements.
This proposed rule, which would not apply to contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold or for the acquisition of commercial items, replaces a previous (and controversial) DoD proposed rule that also attempted to implement section 831, but was withdrawn in October 2018. Comments are due on July 1, 2019.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
