States and Major Environmental and Consumer Organizations Threaten to Sue the Department of Energy Over Alleged Delays in Issuing Energy Efficiency Standards
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.13.20
On Monday, more than a dozen states and major environmental and consumer organizations issued notices of intent (available here and here) to sue the Department of Energy (DOE) for alleged violations of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA).
As discussed in previous client alerts, DOE administers EPCA by setting mandatory appliance efficiency standards or conservation standards for over 60 covered products. Under the law, DOE is required to reexamine the standards for each product at least once every six years, and must update the standards for certain products by specific deadlines.
Although DOE has recently proposed or finalized updates to conservation standards for several products (e.g., metal halide lamps, commercial packaged boilers, portable air conditioners) and issued requests for information regarding several more (e.g., commercial clothes washers, external power supplies, electric motors), the notices of intent to sue allege that DOE is delinquent in reviewing the standards for sixteen covered products under EPCA, and in setting standards for nine more, a list of which is below. Pursuant to EPCA’s citizen suit provision, the states and environmental and consumer organizations must now wait sixty days before filing suit, during which time DOE can seek to cure the alleged violations.
The notices of intent to sue identified DOE as being delinquent in reviewing or issuing standards for the following products:
Small electric motors; pool heaters; water heaters; clothes dryers; room air conditioners; oil furnaces and weatherized gas furnaces; refrigerators and freezers; fluorescent lamp ballasts; residential clothes washers; evaporatively-cooled commercial air conditioners; water-cooled commercial air conditioners; distribution transformers; microwave ovens; direct heating equipment; dishwashers; electric motors; furnace fans; non-weatherized and mobile home gas furnaces; cooking products; commercial water heaters; metal halide lamp fixtures; walk-in coolers and freezers; commercial refrigeration equipment; dedicated outdoor air systems; computer room air conditioners; and variable refrigerant flow (VRF) air conditioners and heat pumps.
If DOE fails to review and/or issue new standards for the above products, the states and the environmental and consumer organizations are expected to file suit upon expiration of the sixty-day waiting period, which would be on or soon after October 9, 2020. It remains to be seen if DOE will issue some or all of the updated product standards before the deadline.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
