1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Show Me the Value: DFARS Proposes Rule on Market Research and Value-Based Price Reasonableness Determination

Show Me the Value: DFARS Proposes Rule on Market Research and Value-Based Price Reasonableness Determination

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.04.19

On September 26, 2019, the DoD issued a proposed rule to implement Sections 871 and 872 of the NDAA for FY 2017, both of which address price reasonableness when acquiring commercial items. 

To implement Section 871, the proposed rule revises DFARS 212.209(a) to reflect Section 871’s focus that agencies must conduct market research to support the determination of price reasonableness for commercial items (the current version simply indicates that market research must be used, where appropriate, to inform price reasonableness determinations). The proposed rule also would add a provision directing contracting officers to use the information submitted under DFARS 234.7002(d) when acquiring major weapon systems as commercial items; or, in the case of other items, other relevant information as described in DFARS 212.209. 

To implement Section 872, the proposed rule would revise DFARS subpart 234.70, which addresses the acquisition of major weapon systems as commercial items, by adding a new paragraph permitting offerors to submit information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item, to aid in the determination of the reasonableness of the item’s price. Relatedly, the proposed rule adds the definition of “value analysis” to clarify that such reasonableness determination is focused on ensuring optimum value based on objective evaluation of the function of the product and its related costs.

Comments are due on or before November 25, 2019.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.20.26

SCOTUS Holds IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful

On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, negating the President’s ability to impose tariffs under IEEPA. The case stemmed from President Trump’s invocation of IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China, and other countries, citing national emergencies. Challengers argued—and the Court agreed—that IEEPA does not delegate tariff authority to the President. The power to tariff is vested in Congress by the Constitution and cannot be delegated to the President absent express authority from Congress....