1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Pre-dispute Agreements to Arbitrate Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Claims Will Be Voidable Pursuant to Federal Legislation

Pre-dispute Agreements to Arbitrate Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Claims Will Be Voidable Pursuant to Federal Legislation

Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.02.22

On February 10, 2022, Congress passed H.R. 4445, titled the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021.” The legislation would amend the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) to render pre-dispute employment arbitration agreements voidable at the election of the employee for all sexual harassment and sexual assault claims. Employees will still be permitted to choose to arbitrate these claims. The legislation would also render pre-dispute employee waivers of the right to bring such claims jointly or on a class basis voidable.

Courts—not arbitrators—decide under federal law whether a claim constitutes sexual harassment or sexual assault subject to H.R. 4445, even if the arbitration agreement includes a provision delegating these decisions to the arbitrator. The law will apply to any sexual harassment or sexual assault claim that arises on or after its date of enactment.

While H.R. 4445 currently awaits President Biden’s signature, there is little doubt that he will sign it. On February 1, 2022, President Biden issued a Statement of Administration Policy encouraging the passage of the bill. In anticipation of the enactment of this law, employers should review and evaluate their current policies concerning the enforcement of employment arbitration agreements to make sure such agreements are not enforced with respect to claims exempt from mandatory arbitration under federal law. Additionally, for new employee arbitration agreements, employers should consider adding a specific carve-out for sexual harassment and sexual assault claims.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.30.26

Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right: GAO Sustains Protest Where Agency Tried to Fix PIA Violation with a Second PIA Violation

Recent sustain decisions by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC and Reliance Test & Technology send a clear message: when an agency tries to fix a Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) violation by committing a second one, the cure can be just as fatal as the disease. The cases involved the U.S. Air Force’s $1.8 billion procurement for O&M services at Elgin Air Force Base. During discussions, the Air Force inadvertently released a pricing overview slide with all offerors’ bottom-line evaluated costs to Reliance Test & Technology, which immediately notified the agency of the error. In response, the Air Force decided to level the playing field by providing the same information to all the other offerors in the procurement, stating, “[o]fferors may consider this disclosure in their [final proposal revision].”...