Permanent Ban Plus $17 Million Monetary Judgment for Debt Relief Scammers, Says FTC
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.08.23
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sued three operators, Sean Austin, John Steven Huffman, John Preston Thompson, and their affiliated companies last year for falsely promising to eliminate or substantially reduce credit card debt for consumers. These companies operated under several names, including ACRO Services, American Consumer Rights Organization, Consumer Protection Resources, Reliance Solutions, Thacker & Associates, and Tri Star Consumer Group.
Since 2019, Austin, Huffman, and Thompson, as alleged by the FTC, have operated a network of companies incorporated in Tennessee, Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming that have worked together to support their deceptive credit card debt relief scheme. The alleged deceptive and unlawful tactics included deceptive telemarketing, false promises of debt relief and deceptive upfront fee charges. According to the FTC, the schemers made tens of millions of dollars from the upfront enrollment fees. Even worse, consumers who signed up for the services were told to stop making payments to their credit card companies, but not informed of the severe consequences of such non-payments.
The stipulated final judgments require that the operators be permanently banned from advertising, selling, or assisting in any debt relief product or services, or participating in telemarketing. The orders also contain total monetary relief in the amount of $17,486,080.
Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, commented that “[w]ith credit card delinquencies surging, the FTC will continue to take aggressive action against those who prey on struggling consumers.”
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.24.26
GAO Finds That Challenge to Agency’s Failure to Comply With DFARS Requirement Comes Too Late
GAO’s recent dismissal of the protest in Tyonek Technical Innovations, LLC, B-424364, B-424364.2, June 30, 2026, carries an important lesson for government contractors: if you believe solicitation terms conflict with a statute or regulation, you must raise that challenge before proposals are due—not during discussions or afterwards.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.23.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.23.26
Second Circuit Affirms Preliminary Injunction Against Nielsen in Constructive Tying Case
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.22.26

