NHTSA Intends to Enforce MAP-21's Indexing Requirement
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.01.16
On March 25, 2016, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2016-01; Guidance on Submission and Treatment of Manufacturer Communications to Dealers, Owners, or Purchasers About a Defect or Noncompliance to (1) inform motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment manufacturers of their statutory obligations to provide indexes for certain communications they submit to the Agency, (2) provide recommendations for complying with the indexing requirement, and (3) indicate NHTSA’s intention to publicly post all such communications and indexes on its website. The bulletin also expresses NHTSA’s intention to enforce the indexing requirement.
Effective October 1, 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) imposed an indexing requirement upon motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment manufacturers. In particular, MAP-21 requires these manufacturers to submit indexes to NHTSA to accompany copies of their communications to dealers, owners, or purchasers submitted pursuant to 49 C.F.R. §§ 579.5 (Notices, bulletins, customer satisfaction campaigns, consumer advisories, and other communications) and 573.6 (Recall communications). MAP-21 specifies the information to be included in the index, which in essence, summarizes the communication. According to NHTSA, although mandated by statute, “the entire industry has been out of compliance with the index requirement.” NHTSA will begin enforcing this requirement, though it will “allow manufacturers a reasonable period of time from the date of this notice to come into compliance with the index requirement on a going forward basis.”
For prior submissions, “to come into full compliance with the law, a manufacturer must submit complete indexes to the communications it previously submitted to the Agency pursuant to 49 CFR 579.5 between October 1, 2012, and the present, along with copies of all communications listed in the index.” Manufacturers cannot submit indexes only; they must also resubmit the original communications. Although MAP-21 also required communications submitted pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 573.6 to be indexed, NHTSA intends to exercise its enforcement discretion and only require proper indexes for future submissions of § 573.6 communications.
NHTSA “expects manufacturers to make a good faith effort to expeditiously comply with the requirement to provide an index to accompany the communications they submit to the Agency.” While the bulletin does not provide a deadline for compliance, NHTSA reminds manufacturers that a failure to provide timely or complete indexes may subject them to civil penalties of up to $21,000 per violation per day, and up to a maximum penalty of $105 million for a related series of daily violations.
Finally, the bulletin provides notice of NHTSA’s intention to publicly post on its website the manufacturer communications and their accompanying indexes, as also required by MAP-21.
Other Articles in This Month's Edition:
- NHTSA Addresses Hacking and Cybersecurity
- NHTSA Identifies Best Practices Regarding Confidentiality Provisions in Settlement Agreements and Protective Orders
- FTC Targets “All Natural” Claims for Personal-Care Products
- The European Commission Is Not Bound by EFSA’s Approval of Food Health Claims
- European Commission Releases 2015 RAPEX Report
- Advertisers in the Ring – A Roundup of This Month's Competitor Advertising Challenges: Best Brands, Hometown Brands, and Playing by NAD Rules
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.27.26
CMS Releases PY 2020 RADV Audit Methods and Instructions: Key Takeaways for Health Plans
On March 20, 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released new guidance outlining the agency’s audit methods and instructions for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans subject to upcoming risk adjustment data validation (RADV) audits for payment year (PY) 2020. In addition to providing necessary context for MA plans selected for auditing, this resource clarifies CMS’s methodological and procedural expectations. While the high-level takeaways are recapped below for convenience, we strongly recommend that MA organizations selected for PY 2020 audits closely review the guidance to understand what may be involved — or required — during the agency’s review.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.25.26
NAIC Intensifies AI Regulatory Focus: What Health Insurance Payors Need to Know
Client Alert | 11 min read | 03.25.26
White House National AI Policy Framework Calls for Preempting State Laws, Protecting Children
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.24.26
California Considering A Massive Expansion of Its Antitrust Laws


