1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New York Revises Disclosure Requirements for Insurance Information in Litigation

New York Revises Disclosure Requirements for Insurance Information in Litigation

Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.01.22

In late 2021, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act, which imposes affirmative insurance disclosure requirements on parties to civil actions. The Governor’s signature came with an approval memorandum stating that the information required to be disclosed must be “properly tailored for the intended purpose, which is to ensure that parties in a litigation are correctly informed about the limits of potential insurance coverage.” 

Consistent with the Governor’s guidance, the New York legislature revised the Act to alleviate some of the burdens imposed by the new requirements. On Thursday, February 24, Governor Hochul signed the revised Act into law.

The required disclosures have been changed as follows:

  1. The required disclosure of copies of all potentially applicable primary, umbrella, and excess policies is now limited to policies that “relate to the claim being litigated.” 
  2. If the adverse party agrees in writing, disclosure can be limited to the declaration page of the applicable policies.
  3. Disclosure of insurance applications is no longer required.
  4. Disclosure of impairment or exhaustion information now requires only disclosure of the amount of the limits available to satisfy a judgment, after accounting for any erosion.
  5. The Act now requires disclosure of one assigned individual with responsibility for adjusting the claim, rather than “any” person with that responsibility.
  6. The disclosure requirements are now prospective only, rather than retrospective.
  7. The time to make required disclosures was extended to 90 days, rather than 60 days.
  8. The obligation to supplement the information provided remains, but is less onerous. The requirement to supplement within 30 days of receipt of new information has been deleted and replaced by reference to certain specified times during a litigation where a party must provide updated information. 
  9. The requirements no longer apply to actions brought to recover motor vehicle insurance personal injury protection benefits.

These amendments reduce the potential burden of the Act. The requirements nevertheless require significant disclosures of insurance information in New York litigation. The Act creates new obligations for defense counsel, and likely will result in new burdens on insurers.

Insights

Client Alert | 8 min read | 06.06.25

Litigation Funding Reforms: Clarity for UK Funders and Litigants Post-PACCAR

On 2 June 2025 the Civil Justice Council (a UK public body that advises on civil justice and civil procedure) (“CJC”) issued its Review of Litigation Funding Final Report (the “Report”). The CJC has provided comprehensive recommendations on the regulation and reform of litigation funding in England and Wales. The highlight recommendation of the Report is for the UK Government to remove third party litigation funding from the regulations and requirements of the Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2013 (“DBA Regulations”), reversing the judgment of the Supreme Court in PACCAR.[1] Meanwhile, the UK Court of Appeal has recently endorsed a position that the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) may order that third party funders of collective proceedings be paid first from litigation proceeds before claimants according to waterfall provisions in their funding agreements....