Is it Allowed? Companies Face New Challenges with an Ever-Evolving List of “Off Limits” Ingredients in Cosmetic Products
Client Alert | 14 min read | 05.07.24
As we have previously discussed, in recent years, consumers have increasingly demanded “cleaner” beauty products and more transparency in product labeling. In addition to the FDA’s increased authority to regulate cosmetics under MoCRA, a number of states have now taken steps to regulate ingredients in cosmetics by limiting, and in some instances even banning, the use of certain ingredients that may be potentially harmful or toxic.
This web of complex and evolving regulations can be challenging for companies that manufacture and sell cosmetic products to track and follow to ensure compliance, especially when their products may be sold nationwide. Below is a May 2024 survey that may be helpful to companies in the process of untangling the current regulatory framework.
By way of background, the vast majority of states (39 of 50) have passed legislation that broadly prohibits (1) manufacturing and selling cosmetics that contain ingredients that allegedly can cause injuries and (2) providing false or misleading information on product labeling or packaging.[1]
Recent state legislation, however, goes one step beyond these regulations. As of May 1, 2024, the following states have enacted or proposed legislation limiting the manufacture, sale, and distribution of cosmetic products containing certain ingredients, including, but not limited to, chemicals like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS):
This recent legislation breaks down as follows:
|
ENACTED legislation banning or limiting use of PFAS in cosmetics |
PROPOSED legislation banning or limiting use of PFAS in cosmetics |
ENACTED legislation banning or limiting use of certain ingredients other than PFAS in cosmetics |
PROPOSED legislation banning or limiting use of certain ingredients other than PFAS in cosmetics |
|
|
|
|
Still unclear as to what is in and what is out? Our team has prepared a List of Banned Ingredients by State—a summary of the ingredients banned or restricted in each state, which we will monitor and update on a routine basis.
[1] States that have such legislation on the books include: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Contacts
Counsel
She/Her/Hers
Insights
Client Alert | 11 min read | 05.17.24
FTC Finalizes Modifications to Broaden the Applicability of the Health Breach Notification Rule
On April 26, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced a final rule (“Final Rule”) modifying the Health Breach Notification Rule (“HBNR”). The Final Rule, which largely finalizes changes proposed in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published last year (“2023 NPRM”), broadens the scope of entities subject to the HBNR, including many mobile health applications (“apps”) and similar technologies, and clarifies that breaches subject to the HBNR include not only cybersecurity intrusions but also unauthorized disclosures, even those that are voluntary. The Final Rule will take effect 60 days after its publication in the Federal Register.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.16.24
CMS Finalizes Contested Rule on Nursing Home Staffing and Facility Assessments
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.15.24
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.14.24
