Insurers’ COVID-19 Notepad: What You Need to Know Now - Week of October 10, 2022
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.10.22
Courts Dismiss COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims
On September 29, 2022, the district court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted Zurich American Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss an orthopedic healthcare business’ COVID-19 business interruption claim. The court concluded that the policy’s “direct physical loss or damage” provisions do not cover loss of use, which “is not structural or physical damage.” Order at 7. Accordingly, no coverage was available because the plaintiff “has not alleged physical damage to its properties but only economic loss.” Id. The case is Reconstructive Orthopedic Assocs. II, LLC v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.
On September 29, 2022, the district court for the Western District of Missouri granted Employers Insurance Company of Wausau’s motion to dismiss a restaurant group’s COVID-19 business interruption complaint. The court found the restaurant did not show a direct physical loss or damage that it suffered to trigger coverage under its policy, including its “[g]eneric allegations that the virus was, or likely to be, on surfaces in a property.” Order at 6. According to the court, the virus and the related government shutdown orders do not on their own cause physical loss or damage. Id. at 7. Even if the virus were to have altered the property, which the complaint did not allege, the policy’s contamination exclusion applies to bar coverage. Id. at 9, 15. The case is One Group Hospitality, Inc. v. Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25



