Samuel Ruddy

Counsel | He/Him/His

Overview

Samuel H. Ruddy litigates complex health care and employee benefits disputes. As a member of Crowell & Moring’s Health Care group and cross-sectional Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, Sam represents managed care organizations, health insurers, employers, trade associations, and health care providers in trials, arbitrations, and appeals. He also counsels clients on mental health parity and out-of-network provider reimbursement laws and regulations. 

Additionally, Sam maintains an active pro bono practice. His pro bono work has included briefing and arguing a Seventh Circuit appeal concerning a state attorney general’s subpoena to a health care research nonprofit, representing voters challenging election officials’ refusal to certify election results, and coauthoring amicus briefs in appeals before the U.S. Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit. 

Sam has held multiple leadership roles in the American Bar Association Health Law Section, including as vice chair of the Section’s Litigation & Risk Management Interest Group, vice chair of the ABA’s Washington Health Policy Summit, and editorial board member for The Health Lawyer and the ABA Health eSource. He has been elected as a fellow of the American Bar Foundation, an honorary society for lawyers “who have demonstrated outstanding leadership in the profession and service to society.” 

During law school, Sam was editor-in-chief of the Georgetown Environmental Law Review and a member of the Appellate Litigation Clinic. He also interned for the Honorable Patty Shwartz of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the Honorable Amit Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  

Prior to law school, Sam served in the Obama Administration, first as an associate in the White House Office of Presidential Personnel and then as a special assistant in the Enforcement & Compliance Division of the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration.

Career & Education

    • The White House
      Associate, Office of Presidential Personnel, 2015–2016
    • Department of Commerce
      Special Assistant, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 2016–2017
    • The White House
      Associate, Office of Presidential Personnel, 2015–2016
    • Department of Commerce
      Special Assistant, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 2016–2017
    • University of Pennsylvania, B.A., magna cum laude, 2015
    • Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., magna cum laude, 2020
    • University of Pennsylvania, B.A., magna cum laude, 2015
    • Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., magna cum laude, 2020
    • Maryland
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    • U.S. District Court of New Mexico
    • Maryland
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    • U.S. District Court of New Mexico

Sam's Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.14.26

Mental Health Parity Bulletin Restates Best Practices for Evaluating Compliance

On September 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued “Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2026-03” to clarify compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) and nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTL). Under the 2013 final rule implementing MHPAEA, health plans and issuers must use comparable processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors when applying NQTLs and they cannot apply such methods more stringently to benefits for mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) compared to benefits for general medical and surgical care. While the bulletin doesn’t break much new ground on compliance, it does reaffirm existing enforcement priorities and expectations. ...

Representative Matters

  • Representing health plans in litigation and arbitration involving reimbursement rates and provider billing practices. 
  • Defending health benefit plan claims administrators in appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding mental health benefits. 
  • Briefing and arguing appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit regarding a state attorney general’s subpoena to a health care research nonprofit. 
  • Representing health insurance issuers in class actions regarding mental health benefits. 
  • Representing a health plan in a national class action challenging hearing aid exclusions. 
  • Defending health benefit plan claims administrators against ERISA denial of benefit and breach of fiduciary duty claims. 
  • Defending managed care organizations against ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims alleging health benefit claims overpayments. 
  • Representing a nursing home in appeals challenging a state Inspector General’s audit adjustment to the home’s per diem Medicaid rate. 
  • Drafting appellate amicus briefs on ERISA statutory interpretation issues for trade associations representing employee benefit plan sponsors, fiduciaries, and service providers. 
  • Serving as outside general counsel to a trade association representing managed care organizations on behavioral health policy issues. 
  • Counseling health plans on compliance with mental health parity laws and regulations. 
  • Counseling managed care organizations, health care providers, and patient advocates on federal No Surprises Act regulations. 

Sam's Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.14.26

Mental Health Parity Bulletin Restates Best Practices for Evaluating Compliance

On September 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued “Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2026-03” to clarify compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) and nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTL). Under the 2013 final rule implementing MHPAEA, health plans and issuers must use comparable processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors when applying NQTLs and they cannot apply such methods more stringently to benefits for mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) compared to benefits for general medical and surgical care. While the bulletin doesn’t break much new ground on compliance, it does reaffirm existing enforcement priorities and expectations. ...

Sam's Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.14.26

Mental Health Parity Bulletin Restates Best Practices for Evaluating Compliance

On September 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued “Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2026-03” to clarify compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) and nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTL). Under the 2013 final rule implementing MHPAEA, health plans and issuers must use comparable processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors when applying NQTLs and they cannot apply such methods more stringently to benefits for mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) compared to benefits for general medical and surgical care. While the bulletin doesn’t break much new ground on compliance, it does reaffirm existing enforcement priorities and expectations. ...