FTC Announces New HSR and Section 8 Thresholds
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.02.21
As if we needed further evidence of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. economy, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced yesterday that the minimum reporting threshold applicable to the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act will decrease from $94 million to $92 million for the coming year. The HSR Act requires that certain transactions be notified and subjected to review by the U.S. antitrust agencies prior to their consummation.
The HSR thresholds are adjusted annually based on changes in the U.S. gross national product. This year’s adjustment represents the first decrease in the HSR thresholds in over a decade. The last time—and the only other time—that the FTC announced a reduction in the thresholds was in 2010, following the Great Recession. While the thresholds are decreasing, it is noteworthy that the number of transactions reviewed by the agencies continues to increase. In fact, the FTC recently announced that it had received a record number of premerger filings in the final months of 2020. The revised HSR thresholds were published today in the Federal Register and take effect March 4, 2021.
On January 21, 2021, the FTC also published in the Federal Register revised thresholds relating to the prohibition of certain interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. These thresholds took effect immediately.
Click here to read a full copy of the FTC's announcement, including a complete listing of the revised HSR thresholds. Click here for a copy of the FTC's announcement and information regarding the Clayton Act, Section 8 thresholds.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.25.26
DOJ Signals Increased Antitrust Scrutiny of Algorithmic Pricing in Willow Bridge Decision
Algorithmic pricing tools commonly used by businesses to increase efficiency and profits are under increasing antitrust scrutiny. This summer, federal regulators, state attorneys general, and state legislatures grappled with competing businesses providing nonpublic, competitively sensitive data to common algorithmic platforms. The Third Circuit deepened an emerging circuit split with the Ninth Circuit on algorithmic pricing liability, reviving antitrust claims against Atlantic City casino-hotels in a decision with direct implications for any company that uses a common pricing platform. See Crowell’s recent client alert. And New Jersey enacted two landmark laws—the FAIR Act and the Fair Price Protection Act—directly regulating algorithmic rent-setting and surveillance pricing. See Crowell’s recent client alert.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.25.26
Recent Court Decision Highlights Effectiveness of “Second Bite” Protests
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know


