FTC Announces New HSR and Section 8 Thresholds
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.02.21
As if we needed further evidence of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. economy, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced yesterday that the minimum reporting threshold applicable to the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act will decrease from $94 million to $92 million for the coming year. The HSR Act requires that certain transactions be notified and subjected to review by the U.S. antitrust agencies prior to their consummation.
The HSR thresholds are adjusted annually based on changes in the U.S. gross national product. This year’s adjustment represents the first decrease in the HSR thresholds in over a decade. The last time—and the only other time—that the FTC announced a reduction in the thresholds was in 2010, following the Great Recession. While the thresholds are decreasing, it is noteworthy that the number of transactions reviewed by the agencies continues to increase. In fact, the FTC recently announced that it had received a record number of premerger filings in the final months of 2020. The revised HSR thresholds were published today in the Federal Register and take effect March 4, 2021.
On January 21, 2021, the FTC also published in the Federal Register revised thresholds relating to the prohibition of certain interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. These thresholds took effect immediately.
Click here to read a full copy of the FTC's announcement, including a complete listing of the revised HSR thresholds. Click here for a copy of the FTC's announcement and information regarding the Clayton Act, Section 8 thresholds.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
