1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Fixed-Price or Firm-Fixed-Price? Contractor’s Right to Seek Reimbursement of Legal Costs in Defending Qui Tam Suits

Fixed-Price or Firm-Fixed-Price? Contractor’s Right to Seek Reimbursement of Legal Costs in Defending Qui Tam Suits

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.20.18

On October 26, 2018, the Court of Federal Claims denied the government’s motion to dismiss a contractor’s lawsuit seeking reimbursement of legal costs incurred in defense of a False Claims Act qui tam suit, and found that the contractor sufficiently pled the requirements for allowability. Tolliver Group, Inc. v. United States, 2018 WL 5307076 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 26, 2018). Tolliver alleged that the legal costs are allocable to the initial fixed-price, level of effort contract, while the government argued that a modification changed the contract to firm-fixed-price—precluding any cost adjustments absent a contract clause providing otherwise. The Court found that the qui tam suit could only have been brought based on Tolliver’s work under the initial task order, and held that the terms and conditions under the initial contract remained in full force and effect, including—by operation of law under the Christian doctrine—the provisions of FAR § 31.205-47 covering allowable legal costs. 


Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.15.25

New York LLC Transparency Act: Key Requirements and Deadlines

On January 1, 2026 (“Effective Date”), the New York LLC Transparency Act ("New York Act”) is scheduled to take effect, introducing new disclosure requirements for limited liability companies (“LLCs”) formed or registered to do business in New York State.  The New York Act is expected to impose the type of broad beneficial ownership requirements the federal CTA and rules implementing it was designed to require, before the federal government’s decision to limit the scope of the CTA’s beneficial ownership reporting requirements to foreign companies and foreign beneficial owners....

View All Insights