Failing Health: NDIA’s Annual Vital Signs Report Highlights Weaknesses in the Defense Industrial Base Supply Chain
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.10.22
The National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) recently published its 2022 Vital Signs: The Health and Readiness of the Defense Industrial Base report, which includes an analysis of the defense industrial base supply chain. The annual report highlights the degree to which the performance of the supply chain is impacted by external events, namely the COVID-19 pandemic, which in turn impacts internal performance metrics. The report posits that the defense industrial base is not inoculated against the same concerns that have negatively impacted commercial supply chains – i.e., the semiconductor shortage. NDIA researchers analyze four supply chain metrics to conclude that the overall performance of defense supply chains has substantively declined from the previous year and is failing: (1) contract failure; (2) financial performance; (3) inventory performance; and (4) cost management. The report also notes that only 30 out of 245 NDIA members surveyed (12%) indicated that their company’s supplier network would be more reliable at delivering goods, materials and services in the future. The remaining 215 members surveyed (88%) concluded that their company’s supplier networks would be about the same or less reliable. In total, the 2022 Vital Signs report paints a bleak picture of the overall health of the defense industrial base supply chain, and NDIA researchers conclude that next year’s supply chain challenges will be even greater.
For more information on managing supply chain risks, please attend Crowell & Moring’s upcoming webinar:
- Thursday, February 24 – White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement Issues in Supply Chain
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.02.25
Supreme Court Hears Argument About Uninjured Class Members
On April 29, 2025, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, dba Labcorp, v. Luke Davis, et al., No. 22-55873. The Supreme Court had granted a petition for writ of certiorari in the case as to the following question: “[w]hether a federal court may certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury.” The Justices focused much of the oral argument on whether the case was moot, suggesting they may not reach the merits. And when soliciting argument on the merits, the Court appeared divided as to how to answer the question.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.29.25
President Trump Issues Executive Order Deprioritizing Disparate Impact Theory of Discrimination
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.28.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.28.25