DOJ and FTC Warn Companies to Avoid Anticompetitive Employment Practices During COVID-19 Pandemic
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.16.20
In a joint statement, the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission recognized that protecting the health, safety and welfare of Americans during the COVID-19 crisis will require unprecedented cooperation among governmental and private sector entities. In doing so, however, the agencies cautioned companies that “COVID-19 does not provide a reason to tolerate anticompetitive conduct that harms workers,” including medical professionals, first responders, and other essential service providers. Thus, while praising companies and individuals that have “demonstrated extraordinary compassion and flexibility in responding to COVID-19,” the agencies stated that they “will not hesitate to hold accountable” those that “may use [the crisis] to prey on American workers by subverting competition in labor markets.”
In their joint statement, the DOJ and FTC indicated that they will be monitoring whether employers, staffing agencies, and recruiters engage in anticompetitive employment practices – including naked wage-fixing and no-poach agreements – that harm workers during the COVID-19 crisis. The agencies stated that they are particularly concerned about agreements among employers to lower the compensation, benefits, or hours worked for healthcare professionals and those who work in grocery stores, pharmacies, delivery and distribution networks, warehouses, and other essential sectors. Companies and individuals involved in such agreements could face criminal prosecution. The agencies also promised to bring civil enforcement actions against companies and individuals that invite others to collude when it comes to employee recruitment and compensation even if such an invitation is not accepted.
The DOJ and FTC further indicated that they may use their civil enforcement authority to challenge unilateral anticompetitive conduct by employers that harms competition in a labor market during the COVID-19 crisis. Such unilateral conduct could include a large employer’s use of its monopsony power in a labor market to artificially suppress wages or to unreasonably limit the employment opportunities for permanent or temporary workers through overly broad or unnecessary non-compete clauses.
The DOJ and FTC’s decision to issue this warning during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be a continuation of the agencies’ focus on increasing their enforcement efforts in the employment context, which the agencies have made a top priority since issuing their Antitrust Guidance for Human Resources Professionals in October 2016.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
After hosting a series of workshops and issuing multiple rounds of materials, including enforcement notices, checklists, templates, and other guidance, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has proposed regulations to implement the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) (both as amended by SB 219), which require large U.S.-based businesses operating in California to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related risks. CARB also published a Notice of Public Hearing and an Initial Statement of Reasons along with the proposed regulations. While CARB’s final rules were statutorily required to be promulgated by July 1, 2025, these are still just proposals. CARB’s proposed rules largely track earlier guidance regarding how CARB intends to define compliance obligations, exemptions, and key deadlines, and establish fee programs to fund regulatory operations.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.17.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
Executive Order Tries to Thwart “Onerous” AI State Regulation, Calls for National Framework
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.17.25
The new EU Bioeconomy Strategy: a regulatory framework in transition

