Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Ramps Up Consumer Protection Oversight Under Biden Administration
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.09.21
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is not wasting any time getting to work to protect consumers. On January 28, 2021, the CFPB’s Acting Director, Dave Uejio, announced that “the CFPB will take aggressive action to ensure that regulated companies follow the law and meet their obligations to assist consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic.” To accomplish this goal, Mr. Uejio directed the CFPB’s enforcement division to accelerate enforcement investigations related to COVID-19.
Consistent with this aggressive approach, Mr. Uejio also announced on February 4, 2021, that he (1) will look to the Division of Research, Markets, and Regulations (RMR) to research the impact of specific industry practices on consumers’ budgets in order to identify policy interventions, (2) expects the CFPB to publish reports addressing racial equity and COVID-19, and (3) will be “assessing regulatory actions taken by the previous leadership and adjusting as necessary and appropriate those not in line with our consumer protection mission and mandate.” Mr. Uejio also asked RMR to focus mortgage servicing rulemaking on averting a foreclosure crisis and to “[e]xplore options for preserving the status quo with respect to QM [Qualified Mortgages] and debt collection rules.”
It appears debt-collection oversight will also be an important focus of the CFPB. Recent public filings by PayPal Holdings, Inc., indicate that the CFPB is looking at debt-collection activities by Venmo, which is owned by PayPal. In its Form 10-K for fiscal year that ended on December 31, 2020, PayPal disclosed: “On January 21, 2021, we received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) related to Venmo’s unauthorized funds transfers and collections processes, and related matters. The CID requests the production of documents and answers to written questions. We are cooperating with the CFPB in connection with this CID.”
Mr. Uejio’s January 28th announcement also made very clear that racial equity is a top priority for the CFPB and said it is “time for the CFPB to take bold and swift action on racial equity…. The country is in the middle of a long overdue conversation about race, and as we all know, practices and policies of the financial services industry have both caused and exacerbated racial inequality. I am going to elevate and expand existing investigations and exams and add new ones to ensure we have a healthy docket intended to address racial equity….” This makes “fair lending enforcement” one of the CFPB’s top enforcement priorities going forward.
State agencies have identified this issue as well noting that the CFPB could be instrumental in addressing these issues. For example, according to New York Governor Cuomo on February 4, 2021, a New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) report found a lack of mortgage lending to homebuyers of color and in majority-minority neighborhoods in Buffalo. The report recommends that the state Community Reinvestment Act be applied to nonbank mortgage lenders and that federal agencies, including the CFPB, should investigate whether fair lending practices are being violated. The CFPB is focused on making improvements in this area.
Given the CFPB’s focus on protecting consumers from financial harm under the global pandemic and racial inequality, businesses and lenders should review their policies and practices in these areas to ensure they do not pique the interest of the CFPB.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25

