1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |At Last! Proposed Amendments to the FAR Reflecting Increased MPT, SAT and TINA Thresholds

At Last! Proposed Amendments to the FAR Reflecting Increased MPT, SAT and TINA Thresholds

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.10.19

On October 2, 2019, DoD, GSA and NASA issued two proposed rules to amend the FAR to implement various sections of the NDAA for FYs 2017 and 2018. Specifically:

  • Modifications to Cost or Pricing Data Reporting Requirements (FAR Case 2018-005) implements section 811 of the NDAA for FY 2018 to increase the threshold for requesting certified cost or pricing data from $750,000 to $2 million for contracts entered into after June 30, 2018. In the case of a change or modification made to a prime contract that was entered into before July 1, 2018, the threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data remains $750,000, with one exception: upon the request of a contractor that was required to submit certified cost or pricing data in connection with a prime contract entered into before July 1, 2018, the CO shall modify the contract without requiring consideration to reflect a $2 million threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data from subcontractors.
  • Increased Micro-Purchase and Simplified Acquisition Thresholds (FAR Case 2018-004) implements section 217(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017 and sections 805, 806, and 1702((a) of the NDAA for FY 2018. The proposed rule: (i) increases the MPT from $3,500 to $10,000; (ii) adds an exception to the MPT for acquisitions from institutions of higher education or related or affiliated nonprofit entities, or from nonprofit research organizations or independent research institutes, and sets the MPT for such entities at $10,000 or a higher amount as determined appropriate by the head of the agency and consistent with clean audit findings; (iii) increases the SAT to $250,000; and (iv) replaces specific dollar thresholds with the terms “micro-purchase threshold” and “simplified acquisition threshold.”

Comments to both proposed rules are due on or before December 2, 2019.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....