1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |States and Major Environmental and Consumer Organizations Threaten to Sue the Department of Energy Over Alleged Delays in Issuing Energy Efficiency Standards

States and Major Environmental and Consumer Organizations Threaten to Sue the Department of Energy Over Alleged Delays in Issuing Energy Efficiency Standards

Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.13.20

On Monday, more than a dozen states and major environmental and consumer organizations issued notices of intent (available here and here) to sue the Department of Energy (DOE) for alleged violations of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA).

As discussed in previous client alerts, DOE administers EPCA by setting mandatory appliance efficiency standards or conservation standards for over 60 covered products. Under the law, DOE is required to reexamine the standards for each product at least once every six years, and must update the standards for certain products by specific deadlines.

Although DOE has recently proposed or finalized updates to conservation standards for several products (e.g., metal halide lamps, commercial packaged boilers, portable air conditioners) and issued requests for information regarding several more (e.g., commercial clothes washers, external power supplies, electric motors), the notices of intent to sue allege that DOE is delinquent in reviewing the standards for sixteen covered products under EPCA, and in setting standards for nine more, a list of which is below. Pursuant to EPCA’s citizen suit provision, the states and environmental and consumer organizations must now wait sixty days before filing suit, during which time DOE can seek to cure the alleged violations.

The notices of intent to sue identified DOE as being delinquent in reviewing or issuing standards for the following products:

Small electric motors; pool heaters; water heaters; clothes dryers; room air conditioners; oil furnaces and weatherized gas furnaces; refrigerators and freezers; fluorescent lamp ballasts; residential clothes washers; evaporatively-cooled commercial air conditioners; water-cooled commercial air conditioners; distribution transformers; microwave ovens; direct heating equipment; dishwashers; electric motors; furnace fans; non-weatherized and mobile home gas furnaces; cooking products; commercial water heaters; metal halide lamp fixtures; walk-in coolers and freezers; commercial refrigeration equipment; dedicated outdoor air systems; computer room air conditioners; and variable  refrigerant flow (VRF) air conditioners and heat pumps.

If DOE fails to review and/or issue new standards for the above products, the states and the environmental and consumer organizations are expected to file suit upon expiration of the sixty-day waiting period, which would be on or soon after October 9, 2020. It remains to be seen if DOE will issue some or all of the updated product standards before the deadline.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....