Just in Time for Halloween: DOJ Launches Cyber Enforcement Initiative Using False Claims Act
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.08.21
On October 7, 2021, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its new Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative, focused on civil enforcement against government contractors that fail to follow cybersecurity contract requirements. The Initiative, led by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch and Fraud Section, will utilize the False Claims Act to combat cyber threats to sensitive information and critical systems by enforcing the government’s contractual cybersecurity standards. The Initiative will hold accountable contractors that knowingly: 1) provide deficient cybersecurity products or services; 2) misrepresent cybersecurity compliance; or 3) fail to monitor and report cybersecurity incidents in accordance with contract requirements.
In addition to contractor accountability, the benefits of the new Initiative are intended to include:
- Building broad resiliency against cybersecurity intrusions across the public and private sectors;
- Ensuring contractors that meet cybersecurity requirements are not at a competitive disadvantage;
- Reimbursing government and taxpayer losses incurred when contractors fail to satisfy their cybersecurity obligations; and
- Supporting efforts to timely issue patches for vulnerabilities in information technology products and services.
The Initiative formalizes what has for several years now been a stated priority area by DOJ for False Claims Act enforcement, as we have previously reported. In accord with the new Initiative, we expect to see an uptick in False Claims Act investigations, settlements, and litigation concerning cybersecurity issues, increased coordination among government agencies, and increased interest by those in the relator’s bar for qui tam actions.
Contacts
Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Client Alert | 5 min read | 11.26.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
