1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Continuing Uncertainty Around Loan Forgiveness in the Paycheck Protection Program

Continuing Uncertainty Around Loan Forgiveness in the Paycheck Protection Program

Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.12.20

The Small Business Administration (SBA) has committed to providing additional guidance regarding many fundamental aspects of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) including loan forgiveness. While awaiting the SBA’s additional guidance on forgiveness, other relevant guidance and analysis has been published.  

First, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued Notice 2020-32 addressing the deductibility for Federal income tax purposes of certain otherwise deductible expenses incurred in a taxpayer’s trade or business when the taxpayer receives a PPP loan. While acknowledging that the CARES Act provides that PPP loan forgiveness is not income, the IRS nonetheless prohibits PPP loan recipients from taking deductions for payments (such as payroll and rent) that are normally deductible business expenses. The Notice finds that Section 265(a) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits deductions for expenses paid with PPP loan proceeds, because those the loan proceeds are “tax-exempt income” and allowing a deduction for expenses paid with this income would lead to a double benefit. While still beneficial, this position somewhat offsets the usefulness of PPP loans as borrowers will not be able to deduct those expenses from income. Congressmen Grassley, Neal, and Wyden issued a letter to Treasury, asserting that the Notice misapplies the law and contradicts Congressional intent. Treasury responded to the lawmakers on May 7th, promising to take their comments into consideration and follow up with their offices.

Second, on May 8, 2020, the SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) released a report on the implementation of the PPP in which the OIG addressed, among other items of note, how the SBA’s position on loan forgiveness as reflected in post-legislation guidance and interim final rules was not fully aligned with the CARES Act. The SBA OIG has recommended that the SBA evaluate the potential negative impact to borrowers arising out of the limitation on loan forgiveness imposed by the SBA in consultation with Treasury that at least 75 percent of the loan proceeds must be used for payroll and to update the requirement, as deemed necessary.  

The Crowell & Moring Team is closely monitoring these developments and will report on any additional guidance as it is published.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....