Continuing Uncertainty Around Loan Forgiveness in the Paycheck Protection Program
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.12.20
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has committed to providing additional guidance regarding many fundamental aspects of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) including loan forgiveness. While awaiting the SBA’s additional guidance on forgiveness, other relevant guidance and analysis has been published.
First, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued Notice 2020-32 addressing the deductibility for Federal income tax purposes of certain otherwise deductible expenses incurred in a taxpayer’s trade or business when the taxpayer receives a PPP loan. While acknowledging that the CARES Act provides that PPP loan forgiveness is not income, the IRS nonetheless prohibits PPP loan recipients from taking deductions for payments (such as payroll and rent) that are normally deductible business expenses. The Notice finds that Section 265(a) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits deductions for expenses paid with PPP loan proceeds, because those the loan proceeds are “tax-exempt income” and allowing a deduction for expenses paid with this income would lead to a double benefit. While still beneficial, this position somewhat offsets the usefulness of PPP loans as borrowers will not be able to deduct those expenses from income. Congressmen Grassley, Neal, and Wyden issued a letter to Treasury, asserting that the Notice misapplies the law and contradicts Congressional intent. Treasury responded to the lawmakers on May 7th, promising to take their comments into consideration and follow up with their offices.
Second, on May 8, 2020, the SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) released a report on the implementation of the PPP in which the OIG addressed, among other items of note, how the SBA’s position on loan forgiveness as reflected in post-legislation guidance and interim final rules was not fully aligned with the CARES Act. The SBA OIG has recommended that the SBA evaluate the potential negative impact to borrowers arising out of the limitation on loan forgiveness imposed by the SBA in consultation with Treasury that at least 75 percent of the loan proceeds must be used for payroll and to update the requirement, as deemed necessary.
The Crowell & Moring Team is closely monitoring these developments and will report on any additional guidance as it is published.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 05.28.26
Texas Targets Big Tech With Wave of Suits and Investigations, Part of Nationwide Trend
Client Alert | 7 min read | 05.27.26
Colorado Hits Reset on AI Regulation: SB 26-189 Repeals and Reenacts the Colorado AI Act
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.27.26
Don’t Get Left in the Doghouse: The Federal Circuit’s Global K9 Case and the Duty to Intervene




