1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Attorneys General Are on the Watch for COVID-19 Related Scams

Attorneys General Are on the Watch for COVID-19 Related Scams

Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.07.20

Now that some businesses are attempting to re-open and must sanitize their locations for employees and the public, Attorneys General will vigilantly monitor for unsupported claims that products can cure or prevent the transmission of COVID-19. They will also watch for claims that a location using these products will be safe for the public. Several Attorneys General have already initiated enforcement actions and issued cease and desist letters admonishing companies who made such representations, and more are sure to follow.

On June 27, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich sent a cease-and-desist letter to Clean Air EXP imploring that the company stop claiming their air purification systems neutralize “99.9% of viruses that are ‘COVID-19 surrogates.’” The letter explains that such representations imply that products can prevent the transmission of COVID-19, while there is currently no scientific support demonstrating that any air treatment product is able to avert transmission of the virus. Attorney General Brnovich’s Office also sent a similar letter to Dream City Church regarding statements it made about an air filtration system it bought from Clean Air EXP, such as that 99% of the virus would be gone when visitors came into the church auditorium and that churchgoers would be “safe and protected.” The church was warned that because it rents its facility for other reasons besides church functions, misrepresentations about the safety of the church could violate the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act.

On June 26, Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum announced settlements with six clinics and companies who sold and advertised products they claimed could cure the virus or possessed immunity boosting properties, though the products were not approved by the FDA or recommended by the CDC. Under the settlement agreements, the companies may no longer make such claims unless they are first approved by the FDA and supported by “competent and reliable scientific evidence.” On June 16, Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge announced a lawsuit against The Jim Bakker Show for telling consumers in Arkansas that colloidal silver products could eliminate the virus, resulting in the sale of over $60,000 worth of products. The FDA has previously advised that such products “are not scientifically recognized to be safe and effective.”

Companies should be aware that Attorneys General are watching for unsupported claims that products can cure or rid the air of COVID-19 or that a business location is free of the virus, as well as other similar scams. To avoid liability, they should carefully ensure that any claims they make about air purification, curing or preventing transmission of the virus, or the safety and cleanliness of business locations are backed by scientific support.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....