1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |At Last! Proposed Amendments to the FAR Reflecting Increased MPT, SAT and TINA Thresholds

At Last! Proposed Amendments to the FAR Reflecting Increased MPT, SAT and TINA Thresholds

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.10.19

On October 2, 2019, DoD, GSA and NASA issued two proposed rules to amend the FAR to implement various sections of the NDAA for FYs 2017 and 2018. Specifically:

  • Modifications to Cost or Pricing Data Reporting Requirements (FAR Case 2018-005) implements section 811 of the NDAA for FY 2018 to increase the threshold for requesting certified cost or pricing data from $750,000 to $2 million for contracts entered into after June 30, 2018. In the case of a change or modification made to a prime contract that was entered into before July 1, 2018, the threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data remains $750,000, with one exception: upon the request of a contractor that was required to submit certified cost or pricing data in connection with a prime contract entered into before July 1, 2018, the CO shall modify the contract without requiring consideration to reflect a $2 million threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data from subcontractors.
  • Increased Micro-Purchase and Simplified Acquisition Thresholds (FAR Case 2018-004) implements section 217(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017 and sections 805, 806, and 1702((a) of the NDAA for FY 2018. The proposed rule: (i) increases the MPT from $3,500 to $10,000; (ii) adds an exception to the MPT for acquisitions from institutions of higher education or related or affiliated nonprofit entities, or from nonprofit research organizations or independent research institutes, and sets the MPT for such entities at $10,000 or a higher amount as determined appropriate by the head of the agency and consistent with clean audit findings; (iii) increases the SAT to $250,000; and (iv) replaces specific dollar thresholds with the terms “micro-purchase threshold” and “simplified acquisition threshold.”

Comments to both proposed rules are due on or before December 2, 2019.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26

PFAS Regulatory Alert: EPA Rolls Back RCRA Proposed Rule on “Hazardous Waste” but Does Not Disturb Proposed RCRA Rule on PFAS

Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program....