1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Department of Labor Publishes Final Regulations Aimed at ESG Investing by Retirement Plans

Department of Labor Publishes Final Regulations Aimed at ESG Investing by Retirement Plans

Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.23.22

In response to 2021 executive orders issued by President Biden, the Department of Labor has finalized new rules relating to investment duties for employee benefit plan fiduciaries. In light of these new regulations, now is a great opportunity for employers and retirement plan sponsors to review their plans’ investment line-ups, QDIA options, and investment policy statements to determine whether changes to the plans’ investment options or strategy may be appropriate.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) imposes duties of loyalty and prudence on retirement plan sponsors and investment fiduciaries in selecting investment options for the plan. For decades, the Department of Labor signaled in nonregulatory guidance that certain types of investments designed primarily to support social, environmental or corporate governance causes or interests (so-called “ESG investing”)–while not necessarily prohibited by ERISA–may run afoul of these duties if financial returns and risks to plan participants are not given sufficient weight.

In 2020, the DOL issued regulations which seemed to formalize that position by requiring plan fiduciaries to select investments and make investment-related decisions based solely on “pecuniary” factors. In particular, the regulations prohibited the inclusion of an investment fund or portfolio in a plan’s qualified default investment alternative (“QDIA”) that includes even one non-pecuniary objective in its investment strategy. Since ESG investments, by their very nature, are not solely focused on pecuniary goals, many retirement plans avoided ESG investing altogether.

On November 22, 2022, the DOL issued a final rule designed to reverse the “chilling effect” the prior regulations had on ESG investing by retirement plans. The DOL regulations indicate, in particular, that the prior restrictions should be eased in order to promote climate change efforts often supported by ESG investing. As a result, the pecuniary/non-pecuniary terminology has been eliminated altogether, and the regulations clarify that the ERISA fiduciary duty of prudence may actually require evaluation of the economic effects of climate change and other ESG factors presented by a particular investment strategy.  The rules also take steps to pave the way for additional ESG investing by retirement plans by easing the QDIA rules and making various changes to proxy voting rules for ESG investments. The final rule becomes effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26

DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability

On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”...