Pierce J. Lee
Overview
Pierce J. Lee is a seasoned international trade attorney renowned for his deep expertise in trade remedies and customs law. With experience spanning both law firm practice and an in-house role at one of the world’s largest steel manufacturers, Pierce brings a distinctive blend of legal acumen and practical business insight to every client engagement.
Career & Education
- University of British Columbia, B.A., economics
- University of British Columbia, J.D.
- Georgetown University Law Center, LL.M., international business and economic law
- District of Columbia
- New York
- British Columbia, Canada
- U.S. Court of International Trade
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Korean
Pierce's Insights
Blog Post | 10.07.26
The U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) has again rejected the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination that chassis manufactured in Vietnam with Chinese-origin parts are covered by the antidumping (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) orders on chassis from China. In Pitts Enterprises, Inc. dba Dorsey Intermodal v. United States, Slip Op. 26-121 (October 7, 2026), Judge Claire R. Kelly remanded Commerce’s redetermination for a second time. The court held that Commerce’s reading of the orders to cover “unfinished subassemblies” is contrary to their plain meaning, and that, in any event, the phrase “any other processing” in the orders does not include welding or fabrication.
Insights
- |
06.01.26
Weekly Customs and Tariff Insights (Korean), vol.2181/ Korea Customs and Trade Development Institute
- |
06.09.26
Crowell & Moring's International Trade Law
Commerce Calls for Public Comments on Targeted Dumping Analysis
|05.19.25
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
Crowell & Moring LLP Secures Significant Legal Victory for Apiário Diamante in Antidumping Duty Case
|05.31.24
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
Pierce's Insights
Blog Post | 10.07.26
The U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) has again rejected the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination that chassis manufactured in Vietnam with Chinese-origin parts are covered by the antidumping (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) orders on chassis from China. In Pitts Enterprises, Inc. dba Dorsey Intermodal v. United States, Slip Op. 26-121 (October 7, 2026), Judge Claire R. Kelly remanded Commerce’s redetermination for a second time. The court held that Commerce’s reading of the orders to cover “unfinished subassemblies” is contrary to their plain meaning, and that, in any event, the phrase “any other processing” in the orders does not include welding or fabrication.


