1. Home
  2. |Professionals
  3. |Meaghan Katz

Meaghan Katz

Associate | They/Them/Theirs
Associate | They/Them/Theirs
bWthdHpAY3Jvd2VsbC5jb20=
VCardLinkedIn
VCardLinkedIn

Areas of Focus

Overview

Meaghan Katz is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s San Francisco office, with a focus on litigation and trial. Meaghan leverages their knowledge of intellectual property, international trade, and privacy law to represent corporate clients across a broad range of industries in complex civil litigation. They also maintain an active pro bono practice in LGBT civil rights.

Meaghan received their J.D. from UC Berkeley School of Law. While in school, Meaghan demonstrated leadership and academic achievement by organizing multiple symposia and moderating talks on copyright law, artificial intelligence, and racial justice for the Berkeley Technology Law Journal; working closely with the ACLU of Northern California as a leader of the Digital Rights Project; and through their surveillance technology litigation research and support as a member of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic. Meaghan also gained valuable experience interning for the Federal Trade Commission’s Western Region San Francisco office.

Career & Education

    • Federal Trade Commission
      Intern, Western Region San Francisco, 2022
    • Federal Trade Commission
      Intern, Western Region San Francisco, 2022

    • University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D., 2024
      Symposium Editor, Berkeley Technology Law Journal
    • University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, M.A., 2020
    • Barnard College, B.A., magna cum laude, 2016
    • University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D., 2024
      Symposium Editor, Berkeley Technology Law Journal
    • University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, M.A., 2020
    • Barnard College, B.A., magna cum laude, 2016

    • California
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • California
    • U.S. Court of International Trade

Meaghan's Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.27.26

Major Questions, Major Drama

The U.S. Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026, opinion in Learning Resources. v. Trump (decided with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections), holding that the President lacks authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), is notable for many reasons — including its practical impact on the many U.S. companies who paid steep tariffs on global imports and may now be able to recover by filing suit before the Court of International Trade (CIT). That possibility and the key reasons for the High Court’s decision are discussed in our recent alert on this momentous decision....

View All Insights

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.27.26

Major Questions, Major Drama

Blog Post | 11.20.25

State AG News: AI Task Force, Consumer Fraud, Funding (November 13-19, 2025)

Blog Post | 10.09.25

State AG News: Energy, Consumer Protection, Social Media

Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.08.25

California’s AI Transparency Act (CAITA) May be Amended to Regulate Social Media Platforms

View All Insights

Practices

Meaghan's Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.27.26

Major Questions, Major Drama

The U.S. Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026, opinion in Learning Resources. v. Trump (decided with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections), holding that the President lacks authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), is notable for many reasons — including its practical impact on the many U.S. companies who paid steep tariffs on global imports and may now be able to recover by filing suit before the Court of International Trade (CIT). That possibility and the key reasons for the High Court’s decision are discussed in our recent alert on this momentous decision....

View All Insights