Josh Sohn
Overview
Josh Sohn is a first-chair trial lawyer with a client-first focus. He places a high priority on cultivating relationships and helping clients identify and achieve their goals in the face of litigation. Through over 25 years of experience, Josh has developed a broad and refined skillset for solving complicated problems.
Career & Education
- Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, J.D., Managing Editor, Cardozo Law Review; Samuel Belkin Award for outstanding contribution to the law school, 1997
- University of Michigan, B.A., 1994
- New York
- Utah
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Supreme Court of the United States
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Josh's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
On April 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a significant ruling in an insurance coverage dispute between a commercial general liability insurer and its policyholder. The decision addresses several critical issues in insurance law, including the scope and continuity of the duty to defend and the standard for insurer reimbursement of defense costs in mixed-claim actions. The court ruled largely in favor of the insured, SVO Building One, LLC ("SVO"), and the matter now heads toward settlement or trial on SVO's remaining counterclaims.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.17.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
Representative Matters
Insurance Recovery
- Regularly advise clients across industries regarding insurance coverage issues in connection with acquisitions, litigation strategy, and general risk management.
- Successfully represented trade association in dispute over defense costs.
- Represent multinational chain of fast casual restaurants in coverage dispute.
- Represent consumer products company in connection with portfolio of environmental coverage issues.
- Represent healthcare company in coverage dispute with primary and excess carriers.
Complex Commercial Disputes
- Represent government contractor in control-dispute arbitration with other member of limited liability company.
- Represent national food-service company in insurance coverage dispute with its carrier.
- Represent national association in insurance coverage dispute with its carrier.
- Represent national consumer products company in supply chain dispute.
Securities Litigation and Securities Enforcement
- Defended a former-CFO in a formal SEC investigation into financial reporting issues, resulting in no enforcement action.
- Successfully represented brokers in insider trading investigations by the SEC’s Boston office and NYSE, with no disciplinary actions taken.
- Obtained a favorable settlement for underwriters in section 11 & 12 securities class action in the Southern District of New York.
Real Estate/Real Estate Finance Litigation
- Represented majority member in disputes with minority member concerning control of limited liability company that owned and managed hotel.
- Represented developer over entitlement to deposit from aborted $122 million deal to purchase Washington, D.C. office building.
- Represented a public agency in breach-of-contract arbitration regarding compliance with construction conditions under a private development agreement.
- Defended a public agency in a $3.5 billion arbitration brought by a private developer over an alleged breach of a development agreement.
Fiduciary Duty/Officers & Directors Litigation
- Defended former officers and directors of a private company in breach of fiduciary duty action brought by the company’s trustee in bankruptcy, successfully obtaining a reversal by the Second Circuit.
- Represented former directors of a public company in defamation and 10b-5 actions.
Employment Matters
- Lead counsel for plaintiff class in employment discrimination case against New York City Board of Education, recovering more than $2 billion for the class.
- Represent employees in contract negotiations with private equity and hedge fund employers.
- Arbitration representation for staffing company against management members alleging breaches of employment agreements and fiduciary duties.
Cross-Border Matters
- Represented an African media company in a breach of contract action against an international media company.
- Defending a UK law firm in litigation and arbitration against former U.S. partners.
- Represented Jamaican fishermen in litigation against the United States Coast Guard over detention conditions.
Josh's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
On April 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a significant ruling in an insurance coverage dispute between a commercial general liability insurer and its policyholder. The decision addresses several critical issues in insurance law, including the scope and continuity of the duty to defend and the standard for insurer reimbursement of defense costs in mixed-claim actions. The court ruled largely in favor of the insured, SVO Building One, LLC ("SVO"), and the matter now heads toward settlement or trial on SVO's remaining counterclaims.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.17.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
Recognition
- New York State Bar Association, President’s Pro Bono Award
- Center for Constitutional Rights, President’s Award
Josh's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
On April 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a significant ruling in an insurance coverage dispute between a commercial general liability insurer and its policyholder. The decision addresses several critical issues in insurance law, including the scope and continuity of the duty to defend and the standard for insurer reimbursement of defense costs in mixed-claim actions. The court ruled largely in favor of the insured, SVO Building One, LLC ("SVO"), and the matter now heads toward settlement or trial on SVO's remaining counterclaims.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.17.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
Insights
Anything Humans Can Do, GenAI Can Do . . . Worse?
|03.01.26
Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law
Our Understanding of Memory Has Changed, The Rules Of Evidence Have Not
|03.08.24
New York Law Journal
Biz Record Admissibility Rule Must Adapt To An ESI World
|05.20.21
Law 360
“Expanding Recovery Streams to Include Insurance,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
|03.05.26
Business Partner: Mitigating Business Disruption Through Novel Times
|09.15.20
ALM's General Counsel Conference
Black, Latino Teachers Collecting $835 Million in Discrimination Lawsuit
|07.14.22
The Wall Street Journal
- |
04.22.26
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
Practices
- Litigation and Trial
- Financial Services Litigation and Disputes
- Recovery
- Securities Fraud and Financial Investigations
- White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement
- Labor and Employment Investigations
- Appellate
- Financial Services Regulatory and Enforcement
- International Litigation
- Securities Fraud and Financial Investigations
- Business Insurance Recovery
Josh's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
On April 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a significant ruling in an insurance coverage dispute between a commercial general liability insurer and its policyholder. The decision addresses several critical issues in insurance law, including the scope and continuity of the duty to defend and the standard for insurer reimbursement of defense costs in mixed-claim actions. The court ruled largely in favor of the insured, SVO Building One, LLC ("SVO"), and the matter now heads toward settlement or trial on SVO's remaining counterclaims.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.17.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26




