Hugham Chan
Counsel
Overview
Hugham Chan is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of its Intellectual Property Group. He litigates patent infringement cases across many industries and has a particular focus on the life sciences and technology sectors.
Career & Education
|
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Assistant U.S. Attorney, 2020–2024
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
- Professorial Lecturer in Law
Legal Research and Writing, The George Washington University Law School, 2016–2017
- Professorial Lecturer in Law
- Rice University, B.S.
- The George Washington University Law School, J.D., with high honors
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- New York
- District of Columbia
- Law Clerk, Honorable Raymond T. Chen, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2017
- Law Clerk, Honorable Reggie B. Walton, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 2016
- Board of Directors, Asian Pacific American Bar Association Educational Fund, 2015–2017
- Asian Pacific American Bar Association–DC, 2013–2014
Representative Matters
- Defended the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s calculation of “A” delay in a patent term adjustment matter. Lundbeck A/S v. USPTO, 2024 WL 3490289 (E.D. Va. July 19, 2024).
- Represented the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as trial counsel at a prosecution laches trial. Hyatt v. Vidal, 2024 WL 2208581 (D.D.C. May 16, 2024).
- Represented the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as appellate counsel in a patent term adjustment case concerning “C” delay. SawStop Holding LLC v. Vidal, 48 F.th 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2022).
- Defended the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in a 35 U.S.C. § 145 action. Nomula v. Hirshfeld, 561 F. Supp. 3d 617 (E.D. Va. 2021).
- Represented the Social Security Administration as trial and appellate counsel in a putative class action regarding auxiliary benefits for early retirees. N.P. v. Kijakazi, 64 F.4th 577 (4th Cir. 2023).
- Defended the AbilityOne Commission, in an Administrative Procedure Act case, against allegations that the agency unlawfully failed to intervene in a dispute between a contractor and a subcontractor. PRIDE Indus. v. VersAbility Res., Inc., 670 F. Supp. 3d 323, 327 (E.D. Va. 2023).