Caitie O. Young
Areas of Focus
Overview
Caitie focuses her practice on managed care litigation, with an emphasis on insurance recovery matters. Her experience extends to representing corporate policyholders in disputes with both foreign and domestic insurers. These disputes encompass a wide range of insurance coverages, such as general liability, professional liability, errors and omissions, directors’ and officers’ liability, managed care liability, cyber liability, and fiduciary liability.
Career & Education
- University of Texas, J.D., with honors, Member, Texas Law Review, 2015
- University of Notre Dame, B.B.A., magna cum laude, 2012
- Illinois
- State Supreme Court of Illinois
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Caitie's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
In Wake Chapel Church, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Company, the Fourth Circuit affirmed a $1.1 million jury verdict in favor of a policyholder, reaffirming that under North Carolina law insurers cannot defeat all-risk coverage by pointing to a postulated inherent defect or other excluded cause if a covered peril also contributed to the loss.
Speaking Engagement | 03.05.26
“Expanding Recovery Streams to Include Insurance,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
Speaking Engagement | 03.04.26
“Healthcare Entities Pay Premiums Too: Policyholder Insurance Recovery Opportunities,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.26.26
Insights
“Expanding Recovery Streams to Include Insurance,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
|03.05.26
“Healthcare Entities Pay Premiums Too: Policyholder Insurance Recovery Opportunities,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
|03.04.26
Caitie's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
In Wake Chapel Church, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Company, the Fourth Circuit affirmed a $1.1 million jury verdict in favor of a policyholder, reaffirming that under North Carolina law insurers cannot defeat all-risk coverage by pointing to a postulated inherent defect or other excluded cause if a covered peril also contributed to the loss.
Speaking Engagement | 03.05.26
“Expanding Recovery Streams to Include Insurance,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
Speaking Engagement | 03.04.26
“Healthcare Entities Pay Premiums Too: Policyholder Insurance Recovery Opportunities,” Twelfth Annual In-House Recovery Conference, Dana Point, CA
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.26.26



