Astor Heaven
Overview
Astor Heaven is a first-chair trial lawyer and litigator who consistently delivers exceptional results. A military veteran, he exacts tough and disciplined advocacy, creates and fosters relationships, provides creative solutions, and deploys team members in a cost-conscious and effective manner. His ability to connect with clients, juries, and judges, and to simplify complex legal issues has made him a formidable presence in and out of the courtroom, contributing to a substantial list of successful outcomes, both in terms of verdicts and settlements.
Career & Education
- American University Washington College of Law, J.D., 2005
- U.S. Naval Academy, 1997
- District of Columbia
- Maryland
- U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
My military and athletic background have really provided the blueprint for how I approach trial and litigation. I want every team member fully invested in the success of the team, which means each member needs ownership in the matter, whether a partner, counsel, an associate, or a paralegal. Those are the teams that are most effective and that get the best results.
Astor's Insights
Client Alert | 9 min read | 05.06.26
After the Verdict: Navigating the Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Fallout
On April 15, 2026, a federal jury found Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster liable on every antitrust count submitted, including monopolization of primary ticketing markets and illegal bundling of its promotions and venue business lines. The jury found the defendants liable for $1.72 for each primary concert ticket sold pursuant to the anticompetitive conduct.[1] The trial opened March 2, 2026, before Judge Arun Subramanian in the Southern District of New York, as a case brought by the federal government and a coalition of states. The case, however, was rocked by an early-trial settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the defendants. Although the DOJ and six of the plaintiff states (Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota) exited the trial, 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected the settlement, brought in a law firm, and moved forward with the trial. Next up for the case: (1) a statutorily required Tunney Act review of the DOJ’s settlement; (2) defendants’ Rule 50 and Rule 59 motions; (3) determination by the Court of how many tickets are subject to the $1.72 damage award (before trebling as per the Clayton Act); and (4) a remedy phase where the Court will consider plaintiffs’ likely proposal to sever Ticketmaster from Live Nation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.20.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.08.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.18.25
House Settlement Approved: How to Prepare for Implementation by July 1, 2025
Representative Matters
General Commercial Litigation
- Secured a favorable decision in federal court after a two-week jury trial pertaining to an employee mobility dispute.
- Prevailed in representing a communications client in state court and on appeal of a matter involving allegations of breach of a lease agreement.
- Secured summary judgment on claims of fraud, fraudulent concealment, and violations of various state consumer protection and unfair competition statutes on behalf of a technology entity in a class action.
- Represented a government contractor in litigation involving the breach of a lease agreement.
- Prevailed in parallel federal and state court actions defending a defense contractor against tortious interference claims pertaining to an offset transaction associated with a foreign military sale transaction.
- Successfully represented and secured millions of dollars in settlements on behalf of corporate clients in actions to recover damages resulting from a price-fixing conspiracy regarding Cathode Ray Tubes and LCD panels.
Arbitration
- Obtained a complete victory defending an aerospace and defense company in an ICC arbitration. Prevailed on a counterclaim and secured more than $37 million in damages, attorneys’ fees, and administrative costs.
- Represented a government contractor in securing a favorable settlement in AAA arbitration pertaining to the breach of a non-solicitation agreement.
- Successfully represented a defense contractor in an ICC arbitration pertaining to a commercial dispute with a subcontractor.
Trade Secrets
- Defeated a request for preliminary injunction and secured a favorable settlement in a trade secrets misappropriation matter pertaining to software code used on a community website.
- Secured summary judgment on behalf of a defense contractor in a trade secret misappropriation matter pertaining to the design and testing of certain U.S. Navy ships.
- Represented a probiotics manufacturer in a matter involving claims of trade secret misappropriation, false advertising, and breach of contract.
- Represented plaintiff E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company in a trade secret misappropriation matter regarding its Kevlar® technology.
Astor's Insights
Client Alert | 9 min read | 05.06.26
After the Verdict: Navigating the Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Fallout
On April 15, 2026, a federal jury found Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster liable on every antitrust count submitted, including monopolization of primary ticketing markets and illegal bundling of its promotions and venue business lines. The jury found the defendants liable for $1.72 for each primary concert ticket sold pursuant to the anticompetitive conduct.[1] The trial opened March 2, 2026, before Judge Arun Subramanian in the Southern District of New York, as a case brought by the federal government and a coalition of states. The case, however, was rocked by an early-trial settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the defendants. Although the DOJ and six of the plaintiff states (Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota) exited the trial, 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected the settlement, brought in a law firm, and moved forward with the trial. Next up for the case: (1) a statutorily required Tunney Act review of the DOJ’s settlement; (2) defendants’ Rule 50 and Rule 59 motions; (3) determination by the Court of how many tickets are subject to the $1.72 damage award (before trebling as per the Clayton Act); and (4) a remedy phase where the Court will consider plaintiffs’ likely proposal to sever Ticketmaster from Live Nation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.20.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.08.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.18.25
House Settlement Approved: How to Prepare for Implementation by July 1, 2025
Insights
- |
11.16.21
International Law Office
Don't Hold Back: The FTC Attacks Endo for Agreeing to Delay Launch of an Authorized Generic
|05.13.16
Bloomberg BNA's Pharmaceutical Law & Industry Report
Pharmaceutical Litigation Update: Changing Landscape
|09.01.15
The Antitrust Counselor, ABA Section of Antitrust Law's Corporate Counseling Committee, Vol. 10.1
Astor Heaven - Big Law Litigation Partner at Crowell & Moring (Podcast)
|01.12.24
How I Lawyer Podcast
Major National Companies Try 'Sponsorship' As New Hammer to Break Glass Ceiling
|11.14.13
The Washington Post
- |
08.09.22
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
City Claims Google’s Water Use Is A Trade Secret and Exempt from Oregon’s Public Records Laws
|11.23.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Illinois Amends Requirements for Non-Compete Agreements
|11.01.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
- |
10.18.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
- |
09.22.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Flying Car Trade Secrets Dispute to Be Heard on the Merits
|09.20.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Addressing Wrinkles in California’s Threatened Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Law
|06.01.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
- |
05.18.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Federal Court Imports California Trade Secret Disclosure Rule and Narrows DTSA Claim
|03.31.21
Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends
Practices
- Litigation and Trial
- Government Contracts
- Trade Secrets
- Intellectual Property Litigation
- Class Action Defense
- Health Care Antitrust
- Investigations
- Recovery
- Supply Chain Management
- Claims and Disputes Litigation
- International Dispute Resolution
- Antitrust and Competition
- Health Care
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- Insurance Recovery
- Supply Chain Recovery
- Arbitration
Astor's Insights
Client Alert | 9 min read | 05.06.26
After the Verdict: Navigating the Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Fallout
On April 15, 2026, a federal jury found Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster liable on every antitrust count submitted, including monopolization of primary ticketing markets and illegal bundling of its promotions and venue business lines. The jury found the defendants liable for $1.72 for each primary concert ticket sold pursuant to the anticompetitive conduct.[1] The trial opened March 2, 2026, before Judge Arun Subramanian in the Southern District of New York, as a case brought by the federal government and a coalition of states. The case, however, was rocked by an early-trial settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the defendants. Although the DOJ and six of the plaintiff states (Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota) exited the trial, 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected the settlement, brought in a law firm, and moved forward with the trial. Next up for the case: (1) a statutorily required Tunney Act review of the DOJ’s settlement; (2) defendants’ Rule 50 and Rule 59 motions; (3) determination by the Court of how many tickets are subject to the $1.72 damage award (before trebling as per the Clayton Act); and (4) a remedy phase where the Court will consider plaintiffs’ likely proposal to sever Ticketmaster from Live Nation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.20.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.08.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.18.25
House Settlement Approved: How to Prepare for Implementation by July 1, 2025




