Anthony Sciuto
Overview
Anthony Sciuto is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Chicago office, where his practice focuses on intellectual property matters.
Career & Education
- Department of Defense
Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, Computer Engineer, 2024–2025 - Department of Justice: Drug Enforcement Administration
Program Analyst, 2022–2024 - Department of Defense
U.S. Air Force, Operations Research Analyst, 2019–2022
- Department of Defense
EY
Data and Analytics, Consultant, 2016–2019
- George Mason University, J.D., 2025
- Air Force Institute of Technology, Graduate Certificate, Data Analytics, 2021
- University of Michigan, M.S.E., Industrial and Operations Engineering, 2016
- Oakland University, B.S.E., Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2014
- Illinois
Anthony's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
On March 11, 2026, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Squires issued a memorandum (2026 memo) to all Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) users titled “Additional Discretionary Institution Considerations — U.S. Manufacturing and Small Business Use of AIA Proceedings.”[1] In the 2026 memo, the director adds three new factors in determining whether to institute inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings.[2] The factors focus on domestic manufacturing and the use of these proceedings by small businesses.[3] The memo applies immediately to all pending IPR and PGR proceedings in which the due date for the patent owner’s discretionary brief has not yet elapsed.[4] Patent owners, petitioners with domestic manufacturing ties, and small business petitioners should take note.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.29.25
More Than Math: How Desjardins Recognizes AI Innovations as Patent-Eligible Technology
Insights
Anthony's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
On March 11, 2026, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Squires issued a memorandum (2026 memo) to all Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) users titled “Additional Discretionary Institution Considerations — U.S. Manufacturing and Small Business Use of AIA Proceedings.”[1] In the 2026 memo, the director adds three new factors in determining whether to institute inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings.[2] The factors focus on domestic manufacturing and the use of these proceedings by small businesses.[3] The memo applies immediately to all pending IPR and PGR proceedings in which the due date for the patent owner’s discretionary brief has not yet elapsed.[4] Patent owners, petitioners with domestic manufacturing ties, and small business petitioners should take note.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.29.25
More Than Math: How Desjardins Recognizes AI Innovations as Patent-Eligible Technology
