Andrea Surratt
Overview
Andrea Surratt calls on her experience as a former federal prosecutor to navigate high-stakes government and criminal investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory matters, and sensitive internal investigations for institutions and individuals.
Career & Education
- Department of Justice: United States Attorneys' Office
District of Colorado (2017–2024)
Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cybercrime and National Security Section, 2017–2024
Digital Currency Coordinator/Digital Asset Coordinator, 2017–2024
Senior Litigation Counsel, 2020–2022
Southern District of New York (2010–2017)
Chief, Narcotics Unit, 2016–2017
Regional Director, Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, 2016–2017
- Department of Justice: United States Attorneys' Office
- University of Virginia School of Law, J.D.
- University of Texas at Austin, B.B.A. Finance & B.A. Economics
- Colorado
- New York
- District of Columbia
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
- Virginia (Inactive)
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, New York, NY, 2009
- Member, Colorado Women’s Bar Association
Andrea's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.28.25
The Supreme Court last week blessed a broad reading of the federal wire fraud statute, resolving a circuit split over whether economic loss is an element of fraudulent inducement and bolstering the Government’s future enforcement of procurement fraud. In Kousisis et al. v. United States (unanimous in judgment), the Court upheld the conviction of a government contractor for falsely representing compliance with disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) requirements in contracts awarded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), despite completing the contracts to PennDOT’s satisfaction. The Court held that a material misrepresentation used to deceive someone into parting with money or property is sufficient for a federal wire fraud conviction, regardless of whether the victim suffered any economic loss.
Speaking Engagement | 05.14.25
Firm News | 3 min read | 12.05.24
Speaking Engagement | 10.29.24
Recognition
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Director’s Award for Protecting the Homeland, 2023
- HSI Denver: Team Award – Cyber and Emerging Technologies, 2023
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Secretary’s Award, 2023
- U.S. Department of Justice: Director’s Award, 2018
- U.S. Federal Drug Agents Foundation: True American Hero Award, 2016
Andrea's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.28.25
The Supreme Court last week blessed a broad reading of the federal wire fraud statute, resolving a circuit split over whether economic loss is an element of fraudulent inducement and bolstering the Government’s future enforcement of procurement fraud. In Kousisis et al. v. United States (unanimous in judgment), the Court upheld the conviction of a government contractor for falsely representing compliance with disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) requirements in contracts awarded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), despite completing the contracts to PennDOT’s satisfaction. The Court held that a material misrepresentation used to deceive someone into parting with money or property is sufficient for a federal wire fraud conviction, regardless of whether the victim suffered any economic loss.
Speaking Engagement | 05.14.25
Firm News | 3 min read | 12.05.24
Speaking Engagement | 10.29.24
Insights
Veteran Federal Prosecutor Joins Crowell & Moring In Denver
|03.04.24
PLI’s Internal Investigations 2024
|06.27.24
"Ethics of Pool Counsel Representation," ABA Annual Meeting
|08.2023
Cryptocurrency, FFA
|06.2023
"New to Federal Practice," Faculty of Federal Advocates, FFA
|03.2023
"Emerging Threats in Cryptocurrency and Cybercrime," InfraGuard
|08.2019
"Money Laundering and Cryptocurrency Investigations, Enforcement, and Regulation for Law Enforcement and Judiciary," Lusaka, Zambia
|08.2018, 04.2019
"Plea Bargaining for Prosecutors and Judiciary," Budva, Montenegro
|05.2015
Andrea's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.28.25
The Supreme Court last week blessed a broad reading of the federal wire fraud statute, resolving a circuit split over whether economic loss is an element of fraudulent inducement and bolstering the Government’s future enforcement of procurement fraud. In Kousisis et al. v. United States (unanimous in judgment), the Court upheld the conviction of a government contractor for falsely representing compliance with disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) requirements in contracts awarded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), despite completing the contracts to PennDOT’s satisfaction. The Court held that a material misrepresentation used to deceive someone into parting with money or property is sufficient for a federal wire fraud conviction, regardless of whether the victim suffered any economic loss.
Speaking Engagement | 05.14.25
Firm News | 3 min read | 12.05.24
Speaking Engagement | 10.29.24