Allison Fleming
Overview
Allison represents clients in internal and government investigations, regulatory enforcement actions, and white collar criminal defense matters. Allison is a member of the White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement practice group.
Career & Education
- Department of Justice: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York
Legal Intern, Civil Division, 2020
- Department of Justice: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York
- Fulbright Foundation, Austrian Combined Grant Recipient, 2018–2019
- University of Michigan Law School, J.D., 2022
- Princeton University, magna cum laude, 2018
- New York
- English
- German
Allison 's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.28.25
The Supreme Court last week blessed a broad reading of the federal wire fraud statute, resolving a circuit split over whether economic loss is an element of fraudulent inducement and bolstering the Government’s future enforcement of procurement fraud. In Kousisis et al. v. United States (unanimous in judgment), the Court upheld the conviction of a government contractor for falsely representing compliance with disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) requirements in contracts awarded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), despite completing the contracts to PennDOT’s satisfaction. The Court held that a material misrepresentation used to deceive someone into parting with money or property is sufficient for a federal wire fraud conviction, regardless of whether the victim suffered any economic loss.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.06.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.23.24
DOJ Promises NPAs to Certain Individuals Through New Voluntary Self-Disclosure Pilot Program
Insights
- |
03.29.24
New York Law Journal
"New York Civil Procedure Training Series," Crowell & Moring, New York, NY.
|06.21.23
Allison 's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.28.25
The Supreme Court last week blessed a broad reading of the federal wire fraud statute, resolving a circuit split over whether economic loss is an element of fraudulent inducement and bolstering the Government’s future enforcement of procurement fraud. In Kousisis et al. v. United States (unanimous in judgment), the Court upheld the conviction of a government contractor for falsely representing compliance with disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) requirements in contracts awarded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), despite completing the contracts to PennDOT’s satisfaction. The Court held that a material misrepresentation used to deceive someone into parting with money or property is sufficient for a federal wire fraud conviction, regardless of whether the victim suffered any economic loss.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.06.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.23.24
DOJ Promises NPAs to Certain Individuals Through New Voluntary Self-Disclosure Pilot Program
