Insights

Washington – June 4, 2026: Crowell & Moring earned 92 individual rankings for 81 attorneys, as well as 48 national and statewide practice area rankings, in the Chambers USA 2026 guide. The Chambers guide ranks the country’s top law firms and lawyers through in-depth research, client interviews, and feedback from attorneys at peer firms. 

Irvine, Calif. – January 27, 2026: John Paik, an intellectual property attorney with more than two decades of experience at leading law firms and technology companies, has joined Crowell & Moring as a partner in the firm’s Intellectual Property Department in Orange County.

For 15 years, the question “Should we file an IPR?” was easy. The answer — almost invariably — was “yes.” High institution rates, a famously skeptical U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and minimal downside made inter partes review (IPR) a nearly reflexive tool in the litigator’s arsenal. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Squires’ precedential decision issued May 14, 2026, in Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Kurin, Inc. (IPR2026-00097) provides clarity to that calculus.

On April 30, 2026, USPTO Director John A. Squires issued an updated memorandum superseding the December 4, 2025, guidance on Best Practices for Submission of Rule 132 Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations (SMEDs). The USPTO has also created a new position — Deputy Commissioner for Patents focusing on AI Policy, Practice, and Operations — and has welcomed longtime practitioner and private-sector AI expert Barry Schindler to this role. This alert summarizes the key updates and actionable guidance for patent applicants and practitioners.

At the European Patent Office (EPO), a recent referral of case T 873/24 from the Technical Board to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may clarify whether last summer’s decision in case G 1/24 on claim interpretation may be extended to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter. Already G 1/24 is impacting the assessment of patentability at the EPO, but should this referral be allowed, G 1/24’s effect on the assessment of added matter could result in a real shake up of the EPO’s notoriously strict assessment of support. Nonetheless, a review of how we got here highlights the value of late arguments during the EPO appeal process.

Cybersecurity is a key concern for all innovative companies and an incident response plan is critical for any company with connected products. Please join Crowell & Moring and industry insiders on May 8 for a discussion on best practices in incident response as we walk through a timeline of a cyber-attack on an autonomous vehicle. We will respond to a realistic intrusion scenario, strategically minimize vulnerabilities, and address multi-disciplinary points of view and decision-making—cybersecurity, regulatory, transactional, and intellectual property—related to autonomous vehicle technology development and deployment. Learn real time incident response, consider effective strategies, and formulate best practices to reach your end goal and ensure minimal risk to your autonomous vehicle business and investments—all in an informal and entertaining setting.  

Learn basic principles of copyright, trademark, trade secret, and patent law, with emphasis on how micro-entrepreneurs should be advised as they develop their business ideas and confront the need to protect their own intellectual property assets and avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of others. The session will include discussion of the advantages of timely registration, practicalities of various search options, strategies for obtaining federal registration, and issues raised when the micro-entrepreneur’s business includes an online presence.