Insights

Washington – June 3, 2025: Crowell & Moring LLP and Faber Daeufer & Itrato have combined to provide companies, academic research institutions, and investors in the life sciences ecosystem with integrated and industry-leading transactional, regulatory, intellectual property, and litigation counsel distinguished by deep industry, trade, and government experience in the U.S. and Europe.  

In June 2025, the European Commission adopted its first-ever measures under the International Procurement Instrument Regulation (IPI), restricting access to the EU public procurement market for medical devices for economic operators and medical devices from the People’s Republic of China. This is the first application of the IPI, a new trade instrument aimed at tackling lack of reciprocity in access to public procurement in third countries.

Commencing October 29, 2025, Massachusetts will join 14 other U.S. states in requiring certain employers to disclose wage pay ranges both in their public job postings and internally to employees who request the information. The requirement is mandated by the Massachusetts law entitled “An Act Relative to Salary Range Transparency” which aims to increase pay transparency and equity in the Commonwealth.

On September 30, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Request for Public Comment (“Request”) inviting stakeholders to share practical experience and recommendations for measuring and evaluating the real-world performance of AI-enabled medical devices, including those powered by GenAI. According to FDA, the Request is not intended to communicate new guidance or regulatory expectations but aims to advance the conversation on how best to assure the safety, effectiveness, and reliability of AI-driven technologies in clinical practice.

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze: