Insights
Sort by:
Client Alerts 66 results
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.01.25
For Better or MORSE: Another Settlement Under DOJ’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.11.24
Allegations of a Litany of Lyin’: Penn State Settles Claims of Cybersecurity Noncompliance
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.04.24
California Dental Offices Settle FCA Allegations Regarding Second-Draw PPP Loans for $6.3M
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.03.24
FCA Complaint Based on PPP Information Pulled from PandemicOversight.gov Website Barred
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.28.24
Supreme Court Rules Gratuity Insufficient For Conviction Under Federal Bribery Law
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.02.24
False Claims Act Settlement Illustrates Value of Disclosure and Cooperation
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.04.24
Counterclaims Against Compliance-Officer-Turned-Relator Survive Motion to Dismiss
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.13.23
DOJ Announces Safe Harbor for Acquirers Who Disclose Pre-Acquisition Misconduct
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.12.23
Civil Cyber-Fraud Settlement Highlights Potential for Cooperation Credit
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.02.23
The continual push and pull between the courts and Congress over the contours of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) has once again spawned proposed legislation unfavorable to FCA defendants, this time poised to curtail defense arguments that continued government payment of claims in the face of alleged noncompliance with contractual or other legal requirements demonstrates a lack of materiality.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 06.28.23
SBA OIG Believes at Least 20% of EIDL and PPP Loans Disbursed Are Potentially Fraudulent
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.12.23
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.21.22
FCA Settlement Offers Reminder of the Importance of TAA and PRC Compliance
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.16.22
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.27.22
Procurement Collusion Strike Force Nabs Another Military Contractor in Bid Rigging Scheme
On June 23, 2022, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against Army contractor Envistacom LLC and two of its executives alleging participation in a fraudulent scheme that deprived the federal government of competition and making false representations to the government in furtherance of the conspiracy. The indictment also charged the executive as a co-conspirator, and asserts the conspirators coordinated in the preparation of so-called “competitive quotes” submitted in connection with 8(a) set aside contracts. The quotes were allegedly fraudulently inflated in order to all but guarantee the government customer would sole source the award to the conspirators’ pre-determined bidder. This indictment represents the fruits of yet another investigation by the Department of Justice’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force (“PCSF”).
Client Alert | 7 min read | 06.03.22
DOJ’s Revised Prosecutorial Guidelines: The “Ethical” Hacker Exemption
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.14.22
Department of Justice Settles First False Claims Act Case Under its Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative
Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.25.21
Us Deputy Attorney General Requests Assistance From Companies in the Fight Against Cybercrime
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.08.21
Just in Time for Halloween: DOJ Launches Cyber Enforcement Initiative Using False Claims Act
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.27.21
Senator Grassley Introduces Long-Promised Proposed Amendments to the False Claims Act