1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Proposed Rule and Guidance: What You Need to Know

Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Proposed Rule and Guidance: What You Need to Know

Webinar | 06.10.15, 9:00 AM EDT - 10:00 AM EDT

Please click here to listen to a recording of the webinar. Please click here for a copy of the presentation.

On May 28, 2015, the Obama Administration published the highly-anticipated proposed FAR rule and proposed DOL guidance implementing the “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces” Executive Order (EO).  The proposed rule and guidance trigger a 60-day public comment period and provide details as to the onerous compliance and reporting burdens that contractors and subcontractors will face after final rulemaking. Implementing what is often referred to as the “Blacklisting” EO, the new rule and guidance – if implemented – will inject subjectivity into the contract award process, as “Agency Labor Compliance Advisors” make recommendations to contracting officers with respect to responsibility determinations, based on new and ambiguous standards set forth in the proposed guidance.

Please join Crowell & Moring for a discussion of the following key areas:

  • The applicability and implementation of “Fair Pay Safe Workplaces” 
  • The “labor law violation” disclosure process
  • Analysis of the rule’s effect upon responsibility determinations
  • The three categories of violations that can trigger a negative responsibility finding, including “administrative merits determinations” that are reached before a hearing on the merits 

For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, Government Contracts , Labor and Employment

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...