Treasury Publishes Admin Ruling: Foreign Exchange Dealers Can Use Non-Resident Aliens' Alternative Travel Docs for Recordkeeping
Publication | 03.12.14
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued, on March 11, 2014, an Administrative Ruling for dealers in foreign exchange allowing the use in certain circumstances of a travel document other than a passport as suitable identification documentation in currency transactions in excess of $1,000. The exceptive relief in this case is applicable only to the recordkeeping requirement in connection with verifying the identity of a non-resident alien. Current examples of such alternatives are the Border Crossing Card bearing a B1/B2 visitor visa issued by the Department of State, and the Radio Frequency Identification Document issued by the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol pursuant to the SENTRI program.
Allowing dealers to satisfy the recordkeeping requirements of 31 CFR § 1022.410(b)(3)with alternative travel documents for non-resident aliens without a passport reconciles current border crossing policy with the interests of financial institutions (“FIs”). In the case of a transaction with a non-resident alien exceeding the $1,000 threshold, each foreign exchange dealer must retain the number and description of the government document used to verify the customer’s identity. This ruling also applies to non-resident aliens using alternative documents who do possess a passport issued by their country of origin.
As always, this ruling does not negate an FI’s obligation to file a suspicious activity report (“SAR”) when due diligence suggests a transaction will in some way violate or circumvent the Bank Secrecy Act or the reporting requirements of any other Federal law or regulation.
Clients should contact Crowell with any questions they might have on alternative travel documents and their impact on due diligence and recordkeeping.
Contacts
Insights
Publication | 06.24.26
How to Reduce the Risk of Commercial Disputes Through Better Contracts
As a disputes lawyer, I come across many disputes that were entirely avoidable, and it is fair to say that commercial disputes are among the most costly and disruptive events a business can face. They consume management time, damage commercial relationships, generate significant legal costs, and — in severe cases — threaten the viability of an enterprise altogether. Yet a significant proportion of disputes that find their way into arbitration tribunals, courtrooms, or mediation suites are not the product of bad faith or genuinely irreconcilable differences. They are, at their root, the product of poorly drafted contracts: documents that failed to anticipate risk, allocate responsibility clearly, or provide workable mechanisms for resolving problems when they arise.
Publication | 06.18.26
Summer Hires Can Leverage AI and Still Produce Signature Work
Publication | 06.15.26
Publication | 06.11.26

