Attorneys React to High Court’s Agency Rule-Making Decision
Press Coverage | 03.09.15
Crowell & Moring's Washington, D.C.-based partner, Daniel W. Wolff, comments in coverage of the Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association case in which the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the U.S. Labor Department, ruling that federal agencies don't have to go through formal rule-making to make significant changes to rules interpreting regulations. Wolff's views on this case also were featured in additional news outlets, including BNA.
Contacts
Insights
Press Coverage | 08.17.26
Regulator ‘looking closely’ at role of banks in loan note scandal
Press Coverage | 08.17.26
Press Coverage | 08.16.26
Banks accused of facilitating Ponzi schemes after missing warnings
Press Coverage | 08.12.26
What Separates Great Bank Regulatory Lawyers? Business Judgment, Says Former UBS Attorney

