1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Vale Columbia Center Symposium: Preventing and Managing Conflict in Energy and Other Natural Resource Investment Relations

Vale Columbia Center Symposium: Preventing and Managing Conflict in Energy and Other Natural Resource Investment Relations

Event | 05.13.09, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

At a time when investment relations in the field of energy and other natural resources are marked by tensions, this Symposium will be an opportunity to foster a dialogue among policy makers, practitioners and academics on the present state of investment relations in energy and other natural resources, and especially on the ways to prevent or at least to manage and resolve conflicts successfully between investors and host countries.

Distinguished panelists and keynote speakers will discuss the interplay of “national interest” (and related concepts) and the uncertainty that the evolving definition of such concepts means for international investment relations, especially in the field of energy and other natural resources. The program will also consider the spectrum of national perspectives on natural resources and energy development relating to major resource holding countries, and how these various national perspectives can inform the policy, regulatory and contractual dialogues.

Ian Laird is a panelist on “Toward an Enhanced Policy Dialogue: global and regional initiatives in search for a common perspective.”

For more information, please visit these areas: International Dispute Resolution

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.