1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Vale Columbia Center - Roundtable on States and State-Controlled Entities as Claimants in International Investment Arbitration

Vale Columbia Center - Roundtable on States and State-Controlled Entities as Claimants in International Investment Arbitration

Event | 03.19.10, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

International investment by State-controlled entities (SCEs) is on the rise. State-owned enterprises (SOEs), especially from Europe, have long been active players in the world foreign-direct-investment (FDI) market. They have been joined, in the past few years, by a wide range of SOEs from emerging markets, including from China, India, Russia, and Singapore. China’s outward FDI – some 80-90% of which is undertaken by SOEs – doubled from $27 billion in 2007 to $56 billion in 2008 and appears to have reached that level again in 2009, in a climate where world FDI flows dropped by 40%. SWF’s, and especially the Middle East, are also of note and, with cumulative FDI reaching $65 billion by the end of 2008, are rapidly gaining prominence on the international stage. To that, portfolio investment by SWFs needs to be added; in the financial sector alone, total investments by SWFs are estimated to be around $100 billion.

Pieter Bekker and Theodore Posner are contributors in this event.

For more information, please visit these areas: International Arbitration

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.