1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The Digital Age Meets the Constitution: Implications of Jones v. U.S.

The Digital Age Meets the Constitution: Implications of Jones v. U.S.

Event | 02.15.12, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

The Supreme Court’s Jones v. United States ruling changed the dynamics of electronic surveillance conducted by law enforcement during investigations. Jones’ three opinions addressing warrant requirements could significantly impact the steps used to secure search warrants in the future.

On Wednesday, February 15, in The Digital Age Meets the Constitution: Implications of Jones v. U.S., an expert panel analyzes the Jones v. United States ruling and the impact it has on electronic surveillance under the Fourth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment.

Justin Murphy is one of the speakers at this webinar.

For more information, please visit these areas: E-Discovery and Information Management

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.