1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Strafford Publications: Avoiding Antitrust Violations in Competitor Collaborations

Strafford Publications: Avoiding Antitrust Violations in Competitor Collaborations

Event | 04.09.08, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

As competing business increasingly seek joint ventures and other collaborations as an alternative to mergers or acquisitions, the risk of antitrust violations increases. Competitors who collaborate must avoid clashing with antitrust laws -- and drawing DOJ and FTC scrutiny.

Listen and participate from your telephone as our authoritative panel of antitrust law specialists addresses the circumstances under which competitor collaborations trigger antitrust investigations and examines best practices for planning and operating ventures with competitors.

Christine White is one of the panelists in this teleconference, along with Michael Lawrence of Intel Corporation and Philip C. Larson with Hogan & Hartson.

Crowell & Moring is happy to offer a 50% discount off of the registration cost for this event. To receive this discount, click the event link below.

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.