1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |SFIA Legal Task Force Thought Leadership: Overview & Guidance to New Proposed Mandatory CPSC Voluntary Product Recall Regulations

SFIA Legal Task Force Thought Leadership: Overview & Guidance to New Proposed Mandatory CPSC Voluntary Product Recall Regulations

Event | 03.27.14, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

Recently companies have become concerned with the CPSC's new proposed voluntary product recall process placing significant burdens on manufacturers of consumer products. Many argue that the existing voluntary recall process is an efficient and effective way of quickly addressing product safety concerns, and that these new regulations could turn the cooperative effort into an unnecessarily expensive legal struggle between the Commission and manufacturers.


Cheryl Falvey is an expert panelist.


For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, Product Risk Management

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.