SEC No-Action Letter: How it Applies to M&A Brokers
Event | 03.25.14, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC
The Staff of the SEC recently issued a novel No-Action Letter that allows M&A Brokers to receive transaction-based compensation for effecting securities transactions in the purchase or sale of privately-held businesses (M&A Transactions) without registering as brokers with the SEC. The Letter expands limited staff relief previously granted to business brokers in several significant ways, including allowing an M&A Broker to represent both buyers and sellers, to participate in the negotiation of a securities transaction, and to effect transactions involving less than the entire business. M&A Brokers may also represent buyers or sellers of any size company.
This webcast will address questions raised by M&A Brokers and their attorneys following the issuance of the Letter, including:
- How the relief applies to venture capital and private equity firms’ transactions with portfolio companies
- Whether foreign intermediaries can act as M&A Brokers
- Whether M&A brokers can pay a finder’s fee to third parties who are not themselves qualified to be M&A Brokers
- Whether a registered broker can also be an M&A Broker
- The duty of a registered broker-dealer to supervise the M&A Brokerage activities
Join David Blass and Darren Vieira of the SEC, and three of the lawyers who drafted the No-Action Letter request, in a session aimed at providing clarity on these issues. Participants may also ask questions of the staff so please feel free to submit those in advance to dmosones@crowell.com.
Speakers
David Blass
Chief Counsel
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Darren Vieira
Special Counsel
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Faith Colish
Counsel
Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP
Martin Hewitt
Attorney at Law
Linda Lerner
Partner
Crowell & Moring LLP
For more information, please visit these areas: Corporate and Transactional, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.04.24
Inside the Arbitrators’ Chambers: Best Practices of Arbitrators