1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Compliance And Enforcement Trends

Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Compliance And Enforcement Trends

Event | 05.24.06, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in 2002 by Congress in response to the major corporate, accounting and document destruction scandals that rocked the stock markets recently. To restore investor confidence, the act establishes a framework for corporate accountability, including strict new standards and penalties for violations in the areas of corporate governance, disclosures, audits, financial reporting and conflicts of interest. This seminar will review the act's requirements and penalties, give practical solutions to assist in compliance with the act and the standards it has set for management, accountants and directors based on 3 ½ years of experience working with the act.

Seminar highlights:

  • Recent developments and insights from SEC, Department of Justice, and NASDAQ experienced attorneys and accountants
  • Navigating the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  • Understanding the dynamics of government and self-regulatory enforcement and regulatory practices under Sarbanes-Oxley
  • How to cope with practical compliance issues
  • Internal investigations under Sarbanes-Oxley

Learning objectives:

  • The attendee will be able to discuss recent enforcement cases.
  • The attendee will be able to identify who is regulated under Sarbanes-Oxley.
  • The attendee will be able to review SEC, criminal and PCAOB enforcement.

Crowell & Moring Participant:

Tom Hanusik will be participating in this one-day seminar is designed for CFOs, controllers, CPAs, attorneys, finance managers, presidents, vice presidents, tax managers, business owners, managers, auditors and bankers.

For more information, please visit these areas: White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.