1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Past Performance Evaluation In Government Contracts - Recent Developments

Past Performance Evaluation In Government Contracts - Recent Developments

Event | 03.09.06, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

The purpose of this special course is to examine the use of past performance as an evaluation factor in competitively negotiated procurements. It includes a practical analysis of recent case law developments and a discussion of "lessons learned" from both Government and contractor perspectives.

The use of past performance is simple in concept but can be troublesome in application. Government agencies must consider past performance when evaluating offerors in solicitations exceeding $100,000. A key in successfully using past performance in the source selection process is to establish a clear relationship between the statement of work and the evaluation criteria of the solicitation. The documentation should show what past performance information the Government will evaluate and how it will be weighted. Further, the Government should focus on information that specifically demonstrates performance quality according to the size, scope, and complexity of the procurement being considered.

Because of the inherently subjective nature of past performance evaluations, no amount of guidance can completely eliminate questionable practices in the evaluation process. By focusing on recent cases and trends in issues, however, we can gain a sense of the critical issues in past performance evaluations today. 

Amy Laderberg will be the course director for this full day seminar for Government and contractor professionals on recent developments and "hot" topics in past performance - and practical advice on how to handle this seemingly unpredictable area of proposal evaluation.

For more information, please visit these areas: Government Contracts

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.