1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Intellectual Property and Product Liability Lifecycle Seminar

Intellectual Property and Product Liability Lifecycle Seminar

Event | 12.11.17, 4:00 PM IST - 8:00 PM IST

Address

Crowne Plaza Tel Aviv, City Center
136 Menachem Begin Street, Azrieli Center 5, Tel Aviv | 6701104 | Israel

Crowell & Moring and ISUS IP are embarking on a new partnership to provide unique offerings to clients.


Please join us in Tel Aviv for our inaugural event; a case study seminar examining a product lifecycle from conception through launch of a hypothetical Israeli product and company entering the US market.


Topics will include:

 


  • Product development
  • Product-driven risk management
  • How to use the US Patent and Trademark Office and the US International Trade Commission to your advantage
  • Product liability problems, disputes and litigation
  • Government investigations
  • Managing innovation
  • Protecting Intellectual Property and Trade Secrets
  • Managing Patent, Copyright and Trademark disputes
  • Infringement litigation
  • Unlawful importation
  • Inter Partes Reviews at the PTO
  • ITC Actions
  • Key points to include in assignments
  • Key practical advice on how to address key issues in licenses, commercial contracts and strategic agreements
  • Managing disputes in the US

Crowell & Moring is an internationally recognized, full-service law firm of approximately 500 attorneys based in Washington D.C. with offices across the U.S. and Europe. We provide sophisticated transactional, regulatory and dispute resolution support for clients across the globe. We represent global businesses, governments and other multinational organizations (both public and private), including a majority of the Fortune 100 companies. Our intellectual property practice offers the full array of legal services, from prosecution and protection of patents and trademarks, to litigation involving unfair competition, copyrights, and trade secrets. Our product liability practice brings together diverse expertise to provide product counseling and risk mitigation to help companies avoid the courtroom and trial-ready litigation talent to help companies navigate legal challenges.

 


ISUS Intellectual Property offers a wide range of IP services, but in a unique, global and cost-effective manner. We operate from two locations. Our US team, with an office located in Washington DC, provides services such as patent and trademark prosecution, negotiations of licensing arrangements and litigation support, while our Israeli team, located in Haifa, focuses on rendering IP management services and advice on commercialization opportunities. Members from both teams work closely to provide our clients with comprehensive, tailored-made solutions to all their IP and IP management needs.


For more information, please visit these areas: Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Litigation, IP Prosecution and Portfolio Management, Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation, Corporate and Transactional, Litigation and Trial, Commercial Contracts and Outsourcing, Corporate Counseling, Governance and Compliance

Contact

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.