1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Homeland Security Policy Breakfast

Homeland Security Policy Breakfast

Event | 02.20.14, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

NIST Cybersecurity Framework:
Release and Next Steps

One year after the President signed EO 13636 (Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity), the National Institute of Standards and Technology has developed a preliminary Cybersecurity Framework and is preparing it for final release. The impending publication of the Framework promises to have wide-ranging effects for the public and private sectors alike. For example, industry may begin to voluntarily adopt the Framework in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security. There are many questions that remain, however, including how the Framework will affect government contracting, whether the Framework may be utilized by third parties such as insurers and courts, and potential regulatory impacts. 
 
 
Please join Crowell & Moring and The Chertoff Group along with panelists from National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Security Staff, Department of Homeland Security and the private sector for a lively discussion regarding these and other critical developments as well as what to expect in the coming year.

PANELISTS
Samara Moore, Director for Critical Infrastructure, National Security Staff (Invited)
Adam Sedgwick, Senior Information Technology Advisor, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Jenny Menna, Director, Stakeholder Engagement and Cyber Infrastructure Resilience Division, Department of Homeland Security
Mark Weatherford, Principal, The Chertoff Group

MODERATOR
Evan Wolff, Partner, Crowell & Moring

There is no charge to attend this event. 

The program will be held at Crowell & Moring, 1001 Pennsylavania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. Registration begins at 8:00 am with the program from 8:30 - 10:30 am.

For more information, please visit these areas: Privacy and Cybersecurity, Government Contracts

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.